Perspectives From the Science-Policy Interface in Animal Health and Welfare

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present scientific perspectives from the science-policy interface in animal health and welfare, with an emphasis on factors critical to scientific effectiveness. While there is broad acceptance of the value of scientific information to inform policy-making, interactions at the science-policy interface are not without difficulties. The literature highlights the need for scientists to build policy relevance to the research focus from the outset, to engage with policy-makers and other stakeholders throughout, to use platforms to facilitate science-policy dialogue, and to disseminate research findings appropriately. In the author's experience, there are a range of factors linked with effectiveness at the science-policy interface in animal health and welfare including a passion for public interest research, scientific independence, a commitment to scientific quality and openness, the opportunities afforded from partnership and collaboration, and an interest in strategic thinking and systems change. In an increasingly complex and rapidly changing world, an objective evidence base for policy decision-making is more important than ever. There is a need for particular attention to the value of collaboration between the natural and social sciences, a recognition among scientists and policy-makers that science is not value-free, the importance of effective communications, and the need to assess and communicate uncertainty. Further, there are particular challenges with science conducted in support of policy development for industry. It is hoped that this paper will stimulate and contribute to discussion and debate, both among scientists and between scientists and policy-makers, to increase scientific effectiveness at the science-policy interface in animal health and welfare.

The Irish Programme to Eradicate Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus—Organization, Challenges, and Progress

“…The issue of retention of BVD+ calves was the central challenge faced by the programme. A series of incremental changes were made throughout the programme, with these decisions either informed by, or retrospectively supported by the outputs of a series of scientific studies and regular analysis of programme data, highlighting the importance of an objective evidence base for policy decision-making (54).…”

Bovine Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) Outbreak Duration in Cattle Herds in Ireland: A Retrospective Observational Study

“…Bovine tuberculosis remains a priority pathogen of cattle in Ireland [ 1 , 2 ] and elsewhere [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ] and one that expends considerable resources from farmers, the state, and, for member states, the EU Commission. As an example, direct annual programme costs in Ireland were estimated at €92 million in 2018, €47 million from the Exchequer, €9.7 million co-financed by the EU, and €35.2 million paid by farmers [ 7 ]. A key challenge is to ensure that disease policy is evidence-based and adapts in response to changes in risk patterns so that programme effectiveness is maximised and stakeholders can be assured that decisions affecting them are underpinned by a coherent epidemiological analysis of the data [ 8 ].…”

Future Risk of Bovine Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) Breakdown in Cattle Herds 2013–2018: A Dominance Analysis Approach

“… The Irish TB programme is evidence based (see More [ 9 ]), it relies on continual engagement with research endeavours [ 29 ], and it requires policies to be based on the most up-to-date data available. The epidemiologic situation has changed in recent years, with the study period representing an historic low incidence in TB in Ireland (2013–2018; [ 9 ]).…”

“…The Irish TB programme is evidence based (see More [ 9 ]), it relies on continual engagement with research endeavours [ 29 ], and it requires policies to be based on the most up-to-date data available.…”