Perspectives of Youths on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Research and Clinical Care

Abstract

ImportanceUnderstanding the views and values of patients is of substantial importance to developing the ethical parameters of artificial intelligence (AI) use in medicine. Thus far, there is limited study on the views of children and youths. Their perspectives contribute meaningfully to the integration of AI in medicine.ObjectiveTo explore the moral attitudes and views of children and youths regarding research and clinical care involving health AI at the point of care.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis qualitative study recruited participants younger than 18 years during a 1-year period (October 2021 to March 2022) at a large urban pediatric hospital. A total of 44 individuals who were receiving or had previously received care at a hospital or rehabilitation clinic contacted the research team, but 15 were found to be ineligible. Of the 29 who consented to participate, 1 was lost to follow-up, resulting in 28 participants who completed the interview.ExposuresParticipants were interviewed using vignettes on 3 main themes: (1) health data research, (2) clinical AI trials, and (3) clinical use of AI.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThematic description of values surrounding health data research, interventional AI research, and clinical use of AI.ResultsThe 28 participants included 6 children (ages, 10-12 years) and 22 youths (ages, 13-17 years) (16 female, 10 male, and 3 trans/nonbinary/gender diverse). Mean (SD) age was 15 (2) years. Participants were highly engaged and quite knowledgeable about AI. They expressed a positive view of research intended to help others and had strong feelings about the uses of their health data for AI. Participants expressed appreciation for the vulnerability of potential participants in interventional AI trials and reinforced the importance of respect for their preferences regardless of their decisional capacity. A strong theme for the prospective use of clinical AI was the desire to maintain bedside interaction between the patient and their physician.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, children and youths reported generally positive views of AI, expressing strong interest and advocacy for their involvement in AI research and inclusion of their voices for shared decision-making with AI in clinical care. These findings suggest the need for more engagement of children and youths in health care AI research and integration.

Exploring the needs of children and caregivers to inform design of an artificial intelligence-enhanced social robot in the pediatric emergency department

“…The need for age-specific tailoring is important for younger children who may visibly display distress rather than vocalizing it. This need also underscores the ethical dimension of this project; literature on human-robot interaction indicates that equity is an important aspect of SAR design [37,38]. Machine-based prioritization of certain languages, accents, or even skin color, has been a major problem in some previous AI-generated tools, and cannot be tolerated [39][40][41].…”

Digital tools for youth health promotion: principles, policies and practices in sub-Saharan Africa

“…In response to these challenges, ethical and governance frameworks are emerging within the fields of digital health and artificial intelligence (AI), and in the space of meaningful youth engagement ( Bulc et al ., 2019 ; Wong, Gray et al ., 2021 ; Wong, Smith et al ., 2021 ; McCradden, 2023 ; Thai et al ., 2023 ). However, debate is ongoing over whether these principles are sufficiently clear and comprehensive to effectively address shortcomings specific to DHP for youth in LMICs, or whether they may overlook certain ethical issues.…”

Health Care Professionals’ and Parents’ Perspectives on the Use of AI for Pain Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Multisite Qualitative Study

“…That is, both parents and HCPs seemed in favor of using AI to augment human intelligence and support more informed clinical decision-making [ 32 ] rather than automating any aspect of clinical care. Similar to youth and adult patients, parents of infants in the NICU were concerned about the risk of clinician replacements and emphasized the importance of the human element (ie, HCP’s presence at the bedside) in clinical care [ 30 , 33 , 34 ]. Clinicians also warned about the potential for diminished skills and overreliance on technology for the next generation of clinicians with regard to pain assessment at the bedside.…”