Perspectives on Educational Language Policy and its Implementation in African Classrooms: A comparative study of Botswana and Tanzania

Abstract

In these two African societies the role played in education by English, the ex-colonial language, is challenged by a national lingua franca: Setswana in the case of Botswana, and Kiswahili in the case of Tanzania. In examining debate over educational language policy in the two countries, I take into account political and economic differences, but I also identify parallels in the hierarchical evaluation of languages. In relation to the likely future direction of policy change, and in considering particularly the viability of English as a teaching medium, I argue that descriptions of classroom practice are necessary to inform effective educational language planning and I draw attention to two interactional patterns which are salient in classrooms in both Botswana and Tanzania, namely the use of bilingual codeswitching and reliance on teacher-centred recitation routines. My discussion links these patterns to the communicative needs of teachers and learners, in classrooms where English is a foreign language for the participants, and also to constraints on opportunities for teaching and learning. In my conclusion I argue that more creative and effective teaching and learning will be facilitated in Botswana and Tanzanian classrooms by pedagogies which are explicitly bilingual, and that this has implications for the of cial separation of languages which is the basis of present policy in both countries.

‘To help them is to educate them’: power and pedagogy in the prevention and treatment of malaria in Tanzania

“…The way in which clinical staff reported educating mothers about malaria showed affinities with the way in which children are taught in school. Arthur has described this as a ‘reliance on teacher‐centred recitation routines’ (Arthur 2001):…”

“…Learning is predominantly by rote, and little attention is paid to process and problem‐solving approaches (Stambach 1994; Peasgood et al. 1997; Arthur 2001; Vavrus 2003). Research on gender effects in schooling have noted the differential treatment of girls and boys by teachers, with one report suggesting that, ‘many teachers consider girls to be naturally less bright, which, through classroom interactions and expectations of teachers, feeds through into girls’ self‐opinions’ (Peasgood et al.…”

Language Development and Social Uses of Literacy: A Study of Literacy Practices in Cameroonian Minority Language Communities

“…In the non-PROPELCA classroom, even though the official expectation is that only English will be used and use of the mother tongue is officially discouraged, in fact even capable teachers use oral mother tongue when they consider it necessary for pupil understanding. (This mismatch between official language policy and language choices in the classroom is not uncommon in sub-Saharan Africa; see Mule, 1999;Arthur, 2001;and Ferguson, 2003). In the PROPELCA classrooms, the use of written mother tongue as a medium of instruction in the early grades is accompanied by oral instruction in English as a subject; in later grades, English comes to dominate the syllabus as time given to mother-tongue medium instruction is slowly phased out.…”

Tanzanian Students' Attitudes Toward English

“…Language policy which advocates the use of a former colonial language may cause students to devalue and look down on their own indigenous languages (Brock‐Utne, , p. 642; Kamwangamalu, , p. 326). Furthermore, when one native language is given a higher status, as is the case with Kiswahili in Tanzania, other indigenous languages may also be marginalized (Arthur, , p. 351).…”