2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijwoe.2010.032923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on emotional labour and bullying: reviewing the role of emotions in nursing and healthcare

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to review the concept of emotional labour both from a theoretical perspective and as a conceptual device for examining the role of emotions in nursing and healthcare. The authors explore a range of perspectives on the concept of emotional labour, each of which identifies different aspects that influence the extent to which emotions are permitted, encouraged or deemed appropriate to be expressed in healthcare settings. They also look at the theoretical links between the emotional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When students attempt to reduce anxiety and divest themselves of negative emotions, and work to solve problems by reflecting and talking with peers (Lopez et al, 2018), they engage in a form of emotional social support that can facilitate active learning and build resilience (Thomas & Revell, 2016). This resonates with the notion of “informal communities of coping” discussed by Smith and Cowie (2010). This phenomenon demonstrates how workers turn to colleagues, instead of supervisors, for a form of peer support in which to share extremely negative emotions and deal with daily emotional pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…When students attempt to reduce anxiety and divest themselves of negative emotions, and work to solve problems by reflecting and talking with peers (Lopez et al, 2018), they engage in a form of emotional social support that can facilitate active learning and build resilience (Thomas & Revell, 2016). This resonates with the notion of “informal communities of coping” discussed by Smith and Cowie (2010). This phenomenon demonstrates how workers turn to colleagues, instead of supervisors, for a form of peer support in which to share extremely negative emotions and deal with daily emotional pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Even with prompts and even after having heard the views of her peers, who were more empathetic and sensitive to the patient’s needs, the nurse did not seem to aware of her blocking behaviour. In fact, she referred to a characteristic of the patient, which may have had the effect of shifting the blame to the patient [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the process of attending to, responding to, and perceiving information, nurses can engage in a mindful exchange [61]. Together with training in how to manage negative emotions, identifying the forms of emotional labour in action while preserving the authenticity of their experience [54] through engaging in their emotions will enhance their communication skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More needs to be done to understand these relationships (West, Brodbeck, and Richter ; Zwarenstein and Reeves ; Cameron ) and, in particular, how emotions shape interprofessional teams working in primary care (West and Field ,b; Pescosolido ). Although the effect of strongly negative emotions on staff in the delivery of care within organizations has been recognized for many years (Obholzer and Zagier Roberts ; Stokes ; Taylor ; Smith and Cowie ), particularly in public sector organizations where staff face continuing organizational change (Cardona ; Obholzer ), this does not seem to be recognized by policy leaders in current service change in health and social care. Pescosolido () has argued for the emergence of leaders to manage group emotions particularly in times of ambiguity, for example, during the process of strategic change in nursing organizations (Furne, Rink, and Ross ) and to reconcile the expectations of different groups of staff trying to meet government directives (Smith and Bryan ; Smith et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%