World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007 2007
DOI: 10.1061/40927(243)565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Technologies and Reuse Options in the Urban Areas of the Mediterranean Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Guzha et al (2005) evaluated the effect of using sanitized human excreta on maize production and water productivity, which recommended that ecological toilets should be added to the list of approved sanitation systems; Bdour et al (2009) discussed several options to achieve sustainability in wastewater treatment, and found that organic nutrient cycles and a closed resource loop could provide an approach for managing valuable wastewater resources; Werner et al (2009) treated the Eco-San system as a new philosophy of dealing with waste and wastewater, which were based on the systematic implementation of the reuse and recycling of nutrients, organics and water as a hygienically safe, closed-loop and holistic alternative; and Magri et al (2013) evaluated the sanitizing effects of different additives for dry treatment of feces from urine-diverting dry toilets to reduce the pathogenicity of microorganisms carried in fecal material to safe levels so that the Eco-San systems could be effective in providing health and environmental pollution control. However, current studies emphasized mainly on principles, technologies, reuse of nutrients and project examples and less are related to evaluation and selection of the system technology and components of the EcoSan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Guzha et al (2005) evaluated the effect of using sanitized human excreta on maize production and water productivity, which recommended that ecological toilets should be added to the list of approved sanitation systems; Bdour et al (2009) discussed several options to achieve sustainability in wastewater treatment, and found that organic nutrient cycles and a closed resource loop could provide an approach for managing valuable wastewater resources; Werner et al (2009) treated the Eco-San system as a new philosophy of dealing with waste and wastewater, which were based on the systematic implementation of the reuse and recycling of nutrients, organics and water as a hygienically safe, closed-loop and holistic alternative; and Magri et al (2013) evaluated the sanitizing effects of different additives for dry treatment of feces from urine-diverting dry toilets to reduce the pathogenicity of microorganisms carried in fecal material to safe levels so that the Eco-San systems could be effective in providing health and environmental pollution control. However, current studies emphasized mainly on principles, technologies, reuse of nutrients and project examples and less are related to evaluation and selection of the system technology and components of the EcoSan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of wastewater sources, some studies focused on urine application (Guzha et al, 2005), urine treatment (Wilsenach et al, 2007), composting of feces (Magri et al, 2013), and co-composting of feces and kitchen waste (Niwagaba et al, 2009c); in terms of performances, some studies focused on economic feasibility (von Munch and Mayumbelo, 2007), technical feasibility (Lehtoranta et al, 2014), and environmental or social impacts (Lehtoranta et al, 2014;Malekpour et al, 2013). In terms of treatment process, previous studies mainly stressed different styles of toilet (Anand and Apul, 2014), the source-separation collection of the domestic wastewater (Bdour et al, 2009), the treatment technologies of different wastewater (black water, yellow water, brown water and gray water) (Mo and Zhang, 2013), and the acceptability of society, human and managers. The spatial scale used to be selected at one house or building (Benetto et al, 2009), one school (Werner et al, 2009), one village or colony.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failure of the conventional urban water supply service model has led many authors, such as Porto et al (2007); Bdour et al (2009) ;Blackmore and Plant (2008); Fidar et al (2010); Memon et al (2005); Sharma et al (2010); Zhang et al (2007) to advocate for alternative urban water supply service models to improve sustainability. Such alternative urban water system service models are centred on a fit-for-purpose water distribution principle (Cook et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2013) that requires the supply of water to be driven by the quality requirements of each specific end-use the water is intended for (Sharma et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bdour et al ( 2009 ) recommended the cyclical or a closedloop treatment system to achieve ecological wastewater treatment. There are plenty of research needs to improve the methods of wastewater treatment in Mediterranean countries.…”
Section: Modern Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%