2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on the assessment of human sperm chromatin integrity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(138 reference statements)
2
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results provided clear support for this hypothesis and showed that the epithelial cells were actively able to discriminate between spermatozoa carrying normal or unstable chromatin. These results are in accordance with an earlier study of human spermatozoa [40] showing that cervical mucus could act as a barrier against the progress of DNA-damaged cells, possibly because the DNA-damaged cells are less motile [41]. The importance of sperm-oviduct epithelial cell binding in controlling sperm quality has been reported in other in vitro studies [42][43][44][45][46][47] and has been proposed as a method for predicting fertility in cows [48] and pigs [49].…”
Section: Sperm Dna and Oviductal Interactionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Their results provided clear support for this hypothesis and showed that the epithelial cells were actively able to discriminate between spermatozoa carrying normal or unstable chromatin. These results are in accordance with an earlier study of human spermatozoa [40] showing that cervical mucus could act as a barrier against the progress of DNA-damaged cells, possibly because the DNA-damaged cells are less motile [41]. The importance of sperm-oviduct epithelial cell binding in controlling sperm quality has been reported in other in vitro studies [42][43][44][45][46][47] and has been proposed as a method for predicting fertility in cows [48] and pigs [49].…”
Section: Sperm Dna and Oviductal Interactionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The SCSA bases its results on (1) the DNA fragmentation index (DFI), which is the percentage in the sample that have measurable increased red fluorescence due to acridine orange attaching to a single strand portion of DNA at sites of DNA strand breaks and then collapsing into a crystal that produces a metachromatic shift to red fluorescence under exposure to blue light and (2) the percentage of high DNA stainability (HDS), which is due to excess histones and proteins other than protamines that prevent full condensation of the sperm chromatin [3032]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different assays are in use including indirect methods such as sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) (Evenson et al, 1980) and sperm chromatin dispersion assay (Fernandez et al, 2003), and direct methods such as Comet (Hughes et al, 1996) and TUNEL assays (Gorczyca et al, 1993). The most frequently used method is SCSA, which assesses the susceptibility of spermatozoa to induced DNA damage as indicated by incorporation of acridine orange and measured by flow cytometry (Evenson, 2013;Palermo et al, 2014). Results are reported as DNA fragmentation index (DFI), the percentage of spermatozoa with a red (denatured single-stranded DNA) to green (native doublestranded DNA) fluorescence ratio above a threshold that is indicative of DNA damage, with the cutoff for subfertility typically set around DFI 25-30% (Evenson et al, 1999;Evenson, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%