The pharmacological properties of the novel antipsychotic drugs (APDs) risperidone, sertindole, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, remoxipride, and amperozide are reviewed and compared with haloperidol and clozapine. Focus is made on their receptor profiles, their effects in animal models used for evaluation of antipsychotic activity, and extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). In addition, the contrasting actions of these compounds on animal modelsDuring the last decade there has been a dramatic increase in the efforts to develop novel antipsychotic drugs (APDs) with improved clinical efficacy and fewer or no extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) than the classical APDs such as haloperidol and fluphenazine. These efforts were undoubtedly inspired by the previous development of clozapine, which fulfilled these criteria to a large extent, although having other troublesome side From the Pharmacological Research, H. Lundbeck A/S, Ohiliavej 9, DK-2500, Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark.Address correspondence to: J0rn Arnt, Pharmacological Research, H. Lundbeck A/5, Ottiliavej 9, DK-2500 Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark.Received January 6, 1997; revised June 26, 1997; accepted July 7, 1997. effects (Baldessarini and Frankenburg 1991; Coward 1992;Wagstaff and Bryson 1995;Buchanan 1995; Ashby and Wang 1996).The novel APDs were assigned the popular term "atypical antipsychotic" drugs to differentiate them from the classic or "typical" APDs or neuroleptics. The most widely accepted definition of a neuroleptic is a compound that has antipsychotic activity and induces EPS with high frequency. The definition of "a typicality" was equivocal, however, because the term was often used for drugs before any clinical results were available. For example, the term was applied to a compound that induced little or no catalepsy in rats, and that was effective in another model believed to reflect antipsychotic activity, e.g., inhibition of O-amphetamine (AMPH)-induced hypermotility. A more precise definition is to base it solely on clinical evidence as a wide differentiation between the dosages used to control psychosis and those inducing EPS-or on other aspects of clinical superior-0893-133X/98/$19.00 PI! 50893-133X(97)00112-7 64 J. Arnt and T. Skarsfeldt ity over classic APDs, e.g., efficacy on negative symptoms of schizophrenia or in drug-resistant patients (for recent review, see Kinan and Lieberman 1996). However, because these very different characteristics are difficult to incorporate in a common definition, we suggest that the terminology "atypical" is best avoided. Indeed, as will be discussed, novel APDs show many individual differences.The suggested alternative terminology "novel APO" is also not precise, but it can be defined as a compound that has been shown to inhibit positive symptoms of schizophrenia and has either been recently launched or is in phase II/III clinical development. Their specific profiles can be described more precisely, e.g., EPS-free APO, etc. It is not anticipated that novel APDs will be marketed in the future, unless hav...