2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-023-03491-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on the Wetting of Solids in Pharmaceutical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At low L/S-ratio, a strong underdosing was detected in the 150–250 µm fraction and limited underdosing in the <150 µm fraction, whereas at high L/S-ratio only limited underdosing in both fractions was seen. As this effect of L/S-ratio on the API distribution over the different sieve fractions could not be attributed to the solubility of the fillers, other properties of the filler particles which affect the wetting behavior (e.g., contact angle, surface energy, particle size, porosity) will contribute to this effect [ 23 ]. The poor wetting of the material and subsequent hindered liquid distribution at low L/S-ratio could prevent part of the material from participating in the granulation process, resulting in a non-homogeneous API distribution over the sieve fractions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low L/S-ratio, a strong underdosing was detected in the 150–250 µm fraction and limited underdosing in the <150 µm fraction, whereas at high L/S-ratio only limited underdosing in both fractions was seen. As this effect of L/S-ratio on the API distribution over the different sieve fractions could not be attributed to the solubility of the fillers, other properties of the filler particles which affect the wetting behavior (e.g., contact angle, surface energy, particle size, porosity) will contribute to this effect [ 23 ]. The poor wetting of the material and subsequent hindered liquid distribution at low L/S-ratio could prevent part of the material from participating in the granulation process, resulting in a non-homogeneous API distribution over the sieve fractions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%