2019
DOI: 10.3166/rea-2018-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pertinence de la prescription des examens biologiques et de la radiographie thoracique en réanimation RFE commune SFAR-SRLF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-pharmacological prevention of anemia in critical care patients consists of interventions designed to decrease these blood losses. The main non-pharmacological interventions designed to reduce the risk of anemia are: blood test reduction strategies, as already proposed in the SFAR-SRLF joint CPG on the relevance of blood tests and chest X-rays in intensive care [13], reduction of the blood volumes drawn and use of blood conservation systems after drawing blood from an arterial catheter.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-pharmacological prevention of anemia in critical care patients consists of interventions designed to decrease these blood losses. The main non-pharmacological interventions designed to reduce the risk of anemia are: blood test reduction strategies, as already proposed in the SFAR-SRLF joint CPG on the relevance of blood tests and chest X-rays in intensive care [13], reduction of the blood volumes drawn and use of blood conservation systems after drawing blood from an arterial catheter.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…International guidelines for monitoring anticoagulation by UFH in the specific population of critically ill surgical patients are not available. In France, current recommendations suggest that UFH anticoagulation should be monitored by anti-Xa activity rather than aPTT in ICU patients [ 1 ], recommendations that are based on single-center and often retrospective studies of small subject numbers that did not include ICU patients [ 2 , 3 ]. One of these studies concluded, “ It remains unclear whether aPTT, anti-Xa, or endogenous thrombin potential provides the most accurate measurement of the global coagulation status of patients receiving UFH ” [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%