1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.6.2145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation Lagrangian Theory for Scalar Fields-Ward-Takahashi Identity and Current Algebra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
130
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
130
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to control the renormalization aspects of the problem, independently of the particular scheme being used, we assume that the quantum action principles [16,17,18,19,20] hold and follow the algebraic approach pioneered in [21,22,23,24] (for reviews, see e.g. [25,26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to control the renormalization aspects of the problem, independently of the particular scheme being used, we assume that the quantum action principles [16,17,18,19,20] hold and follow the algebraic approach pioneered in [21,22,23,24] (for reviews, see e.g. [25,26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(QAP) [14][15][16]. These theorems deal with the whole of Feynman graphs combinatorics and integrability, so that explicit graph considerations are unnecessary -unless one looks for explicit quantitative results for applications to physics, of course.…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by a quantum breaking A which, according to the Quantum Action Principle [7,8,9,10,11], at the lowest nonvanishing order inh, is a local integrated functional with canonical dimensions 2 and Faddeev-Popov charge +1…”
Section: Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course those tools are normally applied in an environment where locality, power counting and the Quantum Action Principle [7,8,9,10,11] also hold true; we might call it a traditional reference frame. In the study of the noncommutative extensions of a standard quantum field theory model, is a matter of personal choice how much we should adhere to this traditional reference frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%