1974
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(74)90018-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation of spectral lines by atomic interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is most clearly revealed by comparing the integral equations (4) and (8). In the quasistatic and the impact limit the two results become identical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This difference is most clearly revealed by comparing the integral equations (4) and (8). In the quasistatic and the impact limit the two results become identical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, the knowledge of these effects, in particular the pressure-induced shifts and widths, is significant for fundamental study of interatomic interactions. Veza et al [1] interpreted their results on the basis of the Lindholm-Foley impact theory [4,5] assuming the interaction between Hg and Ar atoms to have the form of a van der Waals or Lennard-Jones potential and found a reasonable agreement with experimental values. They finally concluded, however, that a better representation for the interaction potentials of excited mercury atoms with argon could be potentials which are a superposition of the polarization potential and the Fermi potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Their experiment was performed on fluorescence light emitted from a natural thallium vapour mixed with a noble gas at rather high pressure (500-1500 Torr at temperature 743 K). In this pressure range the impact approximation of the line shape theory becomes questionable [5][6][7] and this makes it very difficult the interpretation of the measured values of the half-width and shift of the line. Such a conclusion can be drawn directly from experimental results of Cheron et al [4], who have found that the Lorentzian distribution fits the measured profile in the very close vicinity of the core of the line only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%