1963
DOI: 10.1119/1.1969674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation Theory and the Nuclear Many Body Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…may be written in terms of the reaction matrix of Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory as (see, e.g., Kumar 1962, Starace 1972, 1974, Wendin 1976a…”
Section: Wavefunctions and Energy Levels In A Strong-interaction Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…may be written in terms of the reaction matrix of Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory as (see, e.g., Kumar 1962, Starace 1972, 1974, Wendin 1976a…”
Section: Wavefunctions and Energy Levels In A Strong-interaction Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the integral identity of Equation (35) is valid for an arbitrary switching function, allowing the factorization of Equations (37) and (38) It is also of interest to note that the customary assertion [20] that the vacuum amplitude of Equations (24) and (37) can be written as the exponential of connected diagrams in the form is, strictly speaking, irrelevant to the cancellation of Brueckner terms in the energy [Equation (24a)I. In order to clarify this, note that when the amplitude of Equation (39) is expanded one obtains, among others, third-order product terms of the form (3) which, as we have indicated, arise from three distinct time orderings of disconnected vacuum diagrams in the customary perturbation series of Equations (23)- (27). When the diagrams corresponding to the three distinct time orderings are evaluated in the limit of ideal adiabatic switching, the correct Brueckner unlinked terms in the third-order energy appear, and cancel when the time orderings are summed; that is ( t 3 0),…”
Section: = ( L + O ---X +~--O + @ + ( J --G --+(Yj --mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…we shall define, in accordance with common usage [27], the Brueckner unlinked part of the second-order static perturbation function by Of course, the third-order perturbation energy Es (3) also contains closely related canceling Brueckner unlinked terms of the form Note that while the secular and normalization terms of Equations (12)- (16) are identified for an arbitrary perturbation Hamiltonian H , (l), the canceling Brueckner unlinked terms are only identified in the first quantized development when the matrix elements of Equation (20) are evaluated in the case of a many-electron perturbation, as in Equations (21) and (22).…”
Section: H~o ( ' ) H K O (~) mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For non zero pressure in nuclear matter the Fermi energy is not equal to the average binding energy but there are the well known correction (see for example) [18]:…”
Section: Rmf Models Eos and Parton Sfmentioning
confidence: 99%