1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01408186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation theory instead of large scale shell model calculations?

Abstract: Results of large scale shell model calculations for (sd)-shell nuclei are compared with a perturbation theory treatment. It is shown that second order perturbation theory provides an excellent approximation when the SU(3)-basis is used as a starting point. The results indicate that perturbation theory treatment in an SU(3)-basis including 2hco excitations should be preferable to a full diagonalization within the (sd)-shell.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insert a) of Fig. 3 shows the dominance of the irrep (8,1) with spin 1/2 in the ground state band up to J=9/2, in agreement with previous studies [23,24]. At J = 11/2 there is a clear change in the wave function, which for J=13/2, 15/2 is dominated by the (6,2) irrep with spin 3/2.…”
Section: The Su(3) Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Insert a) of Fig. 3 shows the dominance of the irrep (8,1) with spin 1/2 in the ground state band up to J=9/2, in agreement with previous studies [23,24]. At J = 11/2 there is a clear change in the wave function, which for J=13/2, 15/2 is dominated by the (6,2) irrep with spin 3/2.…”
Section: The Su(3) Modelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All calculations were performed using e max = 12 major oscillator shells in order to ensure a satisfactory degree of convergence of the perturbative contributions. The residual change in binding energy when going from e max = 12 to e max = 13 is on the level of 3% for 40 Ca and 90 Zr. For light nuclei the third order perturbative contributions are also shown.…”
Section: B Ground-state Energiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…should keep in mind that there are sizable differences between different experimental data sets. For example, the experimental estimates for the 0d splittings in 40 Ca range from 6 to 8 MeV [36].…”
Section: Single-particle Levels and Spin-orbit Splittingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…as 8 Be. In microscopic studies of 12 C one, indeed, can see that in the 0 2 + -state two of the three α's are slightly more closer to one another than to the third one [55]. The question is definitely very interesting and desserves future investigation, for instance in what concerns the identification of the α structure of the Hoyle state with the THSR wave function in the intrinsic frame.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion Outlookmentioning
confidence: 96%