2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.99.012322
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbative expansion of entanglement negativity using patterned matrix calculus

Abstract: Negativity is an entanglement monotone frequently used to quantify entanglement in bipartite states. Because negativity is a non-analytic function of a density matrix, existing methods used in the physics literature are insufficient to compute its derivatives. To this end we develop techniques in the calculus of complex, patterned matrices and use them to conduct a perturbative analysis of negativity in terms of arbitrary variations of the density operator. The result is an easy-to-implement expansion that can… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(199 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One must be careful with the derivatives of the logarithmic negativity due to its non-analyticity derived from the use of the trace norm. See Ref [103]. for important discussion on taking derivatives of the negativity (in particular the trace norm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One must be careful with the derivatives of the logarithmic negativity due to its non-analyticity derived from the use of the trace norm. See Ref [103]. for important discussion on taking derivatives of the negativity (in particular the trace norm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…maximizing the fidelity over the set of unitaries U on H B . This function is bounded between 0 and 1, with maximally entangled states achieving the upper bound regardless of U. Perturbative expansions of the trace norm appearing in (8) for variations in U or Σ can be carried out using recently-developed methods in patterned-matrix calculus [39]. The operational symmetries enjoyed by fully entangled states motivate new ways to quanti fy quantum entanglement, a burgeoning area of research [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Proof First Let Us Use the Singular Value Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The functions m (ρ) and E S (ρ) are distinct from both the entanglement entropy S (ρ A ) = −Tr (ρ A log ρ A ) and the entanglement negativity N (ρ) ∝ Tr ρ TA − 1, where a superscript T i denotes the partial transpose with respect to subsystem i [37,38]. For pure states, entanglement entropy and negativity reduce to −Tr Σ 2 log Σ 2 , and [Tr (Σ)] 2 − 1 respectively, and share similar behaviours with our measures as demonstrated in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, one of the most commonly used entanglement measures, called negativity, does not conform to the growth behaviour described above. In Chapter 6 we conduct an independent perturbative analysis of negativity and find that additional mathematical tools are required [122]. These new tools are extended from an underdeveloped branch of mathematics known as patterned matrix calculus.…”
Section: Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%