2020
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30863-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
440
6
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 594 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
23
440
6
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of treatment sensitivity, it has been consistently demonstrated that HER2+/HR+ breast cancer patients have a reduced sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy + anti-HER2 agents, as documented by the lower chance to achieve a pathological complete response vs HER2 +/HR-patients [5]. Nevertheless, HER2+/HR+ breast cancer patients derive a similar degree of relative benefit from trastuzumab added to adjuvant chemotherapy [6] and, in the metastatic setting, standard treatments such as first-line trastuzumab + pertuzumab + taxane or T-DM1 have shown similar relative efficacy in registrative trials in both the HR+ and HR-subgroups [7,8]. Despite these results do not justify a substantially different clinical approach to HER2+/HR+ and HER2+/HR-breast cancer, growing evidence strongly suggests that HER2+/HR+ patients may deserve more personalized treatment options.…”
Section: Her2+/hr+ Breast Cancer As a Distinct Subtypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of treatment sensitivity, it has been consistently demonstrated that HER2+/HR+ breast cancer patients have a reduced sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy + anti-HER2 agents, as documented by the lower chance to achieve a pathological complete response vs HER2 +/HR-patients [5]. Nevertheless, HER2+/HR+ breast cancer patients derive a similar degree of relative benefit from trastuzumab added to adjuvant chemotherapy [6] and, in the metastatic setting, standard treatments such as first-line trastuzumab + pertuzumab + taxane or T-DM1 have shown similar relative efficacy in registrative trials in both the HR+ and HR-subgroups [7,8]. Despite these results do not justify a substantially different clinical approach to HER2+/HR+ and HER2+/HR-breast cancer, growing evidence strongly suggests that HER2+/HR+ patients may deserve more personalized treatment options.…”
Section: Her2+/hr+ Breast Cancer As a Distinct Subtypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this primary and nal analysis of 412 patients with HER2-positive MBC, the safety pro le of rst-line H SC plus P IV and D IV was tolerable and consistent with that of CLEOPATRA, in which H was delivered intravenously within the same combination regimen and in a similar patient population [1- 3,5]. No new safety signals were identi ed and AEs of particular interest to P + H therapy, including diarrhea, rash, mucosal in ammation, and febrile neutropenia, occurred less frequently in MetaPHER than in the CLEOPATRA secondary interim OS analysis [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on these results, H IV plus P IV and D IV is the rst-line standard of care for these patients [4]. The CLEOPATRA end-of-study analysis at 99-month follow-up (maximum 120 months) has continued to show improved OS bene t of this regimen (57.1 vs. 40.8 months, HR 0.69), and con rmed the consistency of its long-term safety, including maintained cardiac safety, compared with placebo, H IV, and D IV [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the phase III CLEOPATRA study which compared pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel (TTPH) with trastuzumab and docetaxel in treatment-naïve patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, doublet anti-HER2 agents significantly improved both PFS (18.5 versus 12.4 months, p < 0.001) and OS (57.1 versus 40.8 months, p < 0.001). 52 In the post hoc analysis, pertuzumab also delayed the time of onset of CNS metastasis from 11.9 months to 15.0 months. 53 Since patients with baseline brain metastases were excluded in this study, the efficacy of intracranial control of pertuzumab cannot be evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%