2020
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c01076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pervasive Charge Solvation Permeates Native-like Protein Ions and Dramatically Influences Top-down Sequencing Data

Abstract: Post-translational modifications create a diverse mixture of proteoforms, leading to substantial challenges in linking proteomic information to disease. Top-down sequencing of intact proteins and multiprotein complexes offers significant advantages in proteoform analysis, but achieving complete fragmentation for such precursor ions remains challenging. Intact proteins that undergo slow-heating generally fragment via charge directed (i.e., mobile proton) or charge remote fragmentation pathways. Our efforts seek… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For peptides in higher charge states in which the number of protons is greater than the number of highly basic residues (Arg, Lys), protons may occupy positions along the peptide backbone, weakening amide bonds that cleave through charge-directed routes upon collisional activation. This model also explains the “proline effect” noted upon CID, as the high proton affinity of the unique proline backbone amide favors charge sequestration, consequently promoting cleavage N-terminal to proline. ,,,, For peptides in lower charge states, the ionizing protons are sequestered at side-chains with high proton affinity (i.e., Arg) and unable to migrate to facilitate backbone cleavage. In this scenario, fragmentation commonly occurs C-terminal to Asp, as acidic hydrogens on the carboxylic acid group mobilize to participate in the cleavage of the C-terminal amide bond prior to migration of more tightly sequestered protons. ,, We have already noted and discussed the probable influence of the mobile proton model on the production of b / y ions upon UVPD based on the effects of primary structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For peptides in higher charge states in which the number of protons is greater than the number of highly basic residues (Arg, Lys), protons may occupy positions along the peptide backbone, weakening amide bonds that cleave through charge-directed routes upon collisional activation. This model also explains the “proline effect” noted upon CID, as the high proton affinity of the unique proline backbone amide favors charge sequestration, consequently promoting cleavage N-terminal to proline. ,,,, For peptides in lower charge states, the ionizing protons are sequestered at side-chains with high proton affinity (i.e., Arg) and unable to migrate to facilitate backbone cleavage. In this scenario, fragmentation commonly occurs C-terminal to Asp, as acidic hydrogens on the carboxylic acid group mobilize to participate in the cleavage of the C-terminal amide bond prior to migration of more tightly sequestered protons. ,, We have already noted and discussed the probable influence of the mobile proton model on the production of b / y ions upon UVPD based on the effects of primary structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Re-evaluated and redefined across decades, the mobile proton model is a rigorously tested concept, producing consistent explanations for fragmentation of peptides observed by collision-induced dissociation. ,, , Broadly, the model proposes two major mechanistic routes, classified as charge-directed and charge-remote, for peptide dissociation based on charge site localization . Governing the predominance of either dissociation route is the “mobility” of ionizing protons, in which highly mobile protons promote charge-directed fragmentation, whereas peptides with sequestered protons (nonmobile) favor charge-remote fragmentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations