2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3281508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pest Detection and Classification in Peanut Crops Using CNN, MFO, and EViTA Algorithms

P. Venkatasaichandrakanthand,
M. Iyapparaja

Abstract: The growth of vision transformer (ViT) methods have been quite enormous since its features provide efficient outcome in image classification, and identification. Inspired of this beneficial, this paper propose an Enhanced vision transformer architecture (EViTA) model for pest identification, segmentation, and classification. The as of late found that, compare to machine learning, Convolutional neural network algorithms the ViT has providing trusted results on image classification. Motivated by this, in this pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on deep learning in pest detection can be categorized into two approaches: pest detection and classification and pest-induced leaf infestation feature detection. The research on pest detection and classification mainly focuses on improving the classical deep learning methods, such as P. Venk et al [10], which achieved good results on pest datasets of three peanut crops by integrating VIT, PCA, and MFO; Pattnaik G et al [11], which feature extraction of pests by HOG and LBP, and the extracted feature maps are fed into SVM [12] classifiers for training; In contrast, leaf damage caused by insect pests can be detected in two ways: by quantifying the extent of insect damage to the leaf and by detecting the location of the insect-damaged leaf. For example, Liang et al [13] developed polynomial and logistic regression models for leaf extraction to estimate leaf damage; Da Silva et al [14] used image segmentation to preserve the leaf region, augmented the dataset with a synthesis technique, and trained the network with a model for detecting pest-induced damage to leaves; Fang et al [15], Zhu R et al [16], Zhu L et al [17], and others used the improved YOLO series of models to identify pest-induced leaf damage and achieved good detection results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on deep learning in pest detection can be categorized into two approaches: pest detection and classification and pest-induced leaf infestation feature detection. The research on pest detection and classification mainly focuses on improving the classical deep learning methods, such as P. Venk et al [10], which achieved good results on pest datasets of three peanut crops by integrating VIT, PCA, and MFO; Pattnaik G et al [11], which feature extraction of pests by HOG and LBP, and the extracted feature maps are fed into SVM [12] classifiers for training; In contrast, leaf damage caused by insect pests can be detected in two ways: by quantifying the extent of insect damage to the leaf and by detecting the location of the insect-damaged leaf. For example, Liang et al [13] developed polynomial and logistic regression models for leaf extraction to estimate leaf damage; Da Silva et al [14] used image segmentation to preserve the leaf region, augmented the dataset with a synthesis technique, and trained the network with a model for detecting pest-induced damage to leaves; Fang et al [15], Zhu R et al [16], Zhu L et al [17], and others used the improved YOLO series of models to identify pest-induced leaf damage and achieved good detection results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%