2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pesticide poisoning of farm workers–implications of blood test results from Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
90
0
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
90
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if farmers use pesticides carelessly or without proper knowledge, a percentage of the pesticide may remain in the environment for many years (34), become a contaminant in soil and/or groundwater (2), and be poisonous to farmers (25). …”
Section: Methods Used For Crop Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if farmers use pesticides carelessly or without proper knowledge, a percentage of the pesticide may remain in the environment for many years (34), become a contaminant in soil and/or groundwater (2), and be poisonous to farmers (25). …”
Section: Methods Used For Crop Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rice farmers in Vietnam's Mekong Delta were also found to be affected by pesticide poisoning which was relatively low in those who avoided the more toxic pesticides and used protective clothing. The affected people often failed to detect the symptoms and manifestations of pesticide toxicity which were revealed by medical tests (Dasgupta et al, 2007). Adoption of a few simple measures such as using good quality sprayers, not smoking during spraying, wearing headgear and changing clothes immediately after spraying significantly reduced the symptoms after spraying in Malaysian farmers (Nordin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy workers can be less vulnerable to cotton picking than those who have already certain health problems. Dasgupta et al [31] point out that blood testing is more appropriate because self-reported symptoms are weak indicators of health impacts. But blood sampling at field level in the present study was highly difficult in the absence of finance and medical personnel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%