2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2005.00007.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pesticides in groundwater: some observations on temporal and spatial trends

Abstract: Pesticides were detected in 11 (78%) of the boreholes, and in 8 (57%) at concentrations exceeding the PCV on at least one occasion. These findings were complemented by data from deeper boreholes in which concentrations exceeding the PCV were also detected. Pesticide occurrence could be related to landuse; mecoprop and isoproturon were frequently detected at several locations reflecting the arable landuse, dicamba at a golf course, and atrazine, propazine and terbutryn near a railway. Temporal variations have e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, increasing interest in this topic in recent years, as well as the improvement in the methods of analysis, has produced more information about the quality of groundwater. In recent years several monitoring programmes have been applied in the USA [2][3][4][5][6][7] and in many European countries [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] to determine a large variety of pesticides and some transformation products (TPs) in groundwater. Although some data are available on pesticide residues in Spanish groundwater [16][17][18][19][20], there is a lack of monitoring programmes of sufficient scope to focus on the compounds that are most widely applied and, consequently, with the highest potential to contaminate groundwater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, increasing interest in this topic in recent years, as well as the improvement in the methods of analysis, has produced more information about the quality of groundwater. In recent years several monitoring programmes have been applied in the USA [2][3][4][5][6][7] and in many European countries [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] to determine a large variety of pesticides and some transformation products (TPs) in groundwater. Although some data are available on pesticide residues in Spanish groundwater [16][17][18][19][20], there is a lack of monitoring programmes of sufficient scope to focus on the compounds that are most widely applied and, consequently, with the highest potential to contaminate groundwater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of atrazine in this study were found above 0.1 µg/L, the UK drinking water limit for individual pesticides, as set out in the Drinking Water Regulations (HMSO, 2000), which were transposed from the Drinking Water Directive (EC, 1998). Lapworth et al (2006) detail the concentrations of pesticides (no metabolites in the analytical suites used) in 14 wells < 30 m bgl over the period January 2002 to November 2003 (prior to the ban) in the Sherwood Sandstone aquifer underlying Doncaster and the area to the east. The study found atrazine and simazine in 4 of the study sites, maximum and average concentrations found for atrazine were 4.2 µg/L and 0.585 µg/L; and simazine 0.062 µg/L and 0.030 µg/L respectively.…”
Section: Micro-organic Tracers: Evidence Of Multiple Pathways In the mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repeatability of the depths and concentrations implies a consistent source/ pathway at each site. As discussed above, evidence from previous studies and other analytes within this study point at an area of slower groundwater flow and greater residence time at these central depths within the sandstone beneath HP and MS. Atrazine was used extensively for amenity use in the UK prior to its registration being withdrawn for non-crop uses use in 1992 due to its persistence in groundwater, and this is a likely source of atrazine contamination within this urban Sandstone aquifer (Knapp, 2005;Lapworth et al, 2006). The atrazine peaks at these two sites suggests multi-point contamination within the Sandstone matrix, and if the ban on non-crop use is taken as the last usage date this corresponds to contamination from at least 22 years ago.…”
Section: Micro-organic Tracers: Evidence Of Multiple Pathways In the mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The persistence of atrazine and diuron, and their degradates, in groundwater in the UK for many years after it was withdrawn for non-agricultural use highlights the importance of these other sources [41,148]. Parsons et al (2008) carried out an assessment of risk from pesticide metabolites for both the US and the UK [149].…”
Section: Key Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%