Pesticides monitoring in biological fluids: Mapping the gaps in analytical strategies

Fama, Francesco; Feltracco, Matteo; Moro, Giulia; Barbaro, Elena; Bassanello, Marco; Gambaro, Andrea; Zanardi, Chiara

doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123969

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 165 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are many types of analytical techniques that can be used for the detection and quantification of glyphosate and similar compounds. For environmental and food analysis (water, soil, plants), the most widely used techniques involve liquid chromatography, for example, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with either ultraviolet detection (UV) or fluorescence detectors (FLD) and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS or LC-ICP-MS), but methods also exist that use ion chromatography (IC) [ 22 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. For bioanalytical and biomonitoring purposes, methods for glyphosate determination in biological matrices (urine, blood, plasma, serum) described in the literature have mostly used liquid chromatography techniques coupled with different types of detection (ultraviolet, fluorescence, but most often mass spectrometry) [ 19 , 21 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 44 , 45 ].…”

Section: Difficulties In Laboratory Assessment Of Glyphosate—ongoing ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For environmental and food analysis (water, soil, plants), the most widely used techniques involve liquid chromatography, for example, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with either ultraviolet detection (UV) or fluorescence detectors (FLD) and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS or LC-ICP-MS), but methods also exist that use ion chromatography (IC) [ 22 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. For bioanalytical and biomonitoring purposes, methods for glyphosate determination in biological matrices (urine, blood, plasma, serum) described in the literature have mostly used liquid chromatography techniques coupled with different types of detection (ultraviolet, fluorescence, but most often mass spectrometry) [ 19 , 21 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 44 , 45 ]. Other techniques such as gas chromatography (GC), which is also frequently coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), ion chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection [ 46 ], and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have also been used for glyphosate determination [ 21 , 25 ].…”

Section: Difficulties In Laboratory Assessment Of Glyphosate—ongoing ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Methods and Strategies for Biomonitoring in Occupational Exposure to Plant Protection Products Containing Glyphosate

Moldovan

Imre

Duca

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Glyphosate, and the ever growing reliance on its use in agriculture, has been a point of contention for many years. There have been debates regarding the risk and safety of using glyphosate-based herbicides as well as the effects of occupational, accidental, or systematic. Although there have been a number of studies conducted, the biomonitoring of glyphosate poses a series of challenges. Researchers attempting to determine the occupational exposure face questions regarding the most appropriate analytical techniques and sampling procedures. The present review aims to summarize and synthetize the analytical methodologies available and suitable for the purpose of glyphosate biomonitoring studies as well as discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each analytical technique, from the most modern to more well-established and older ones. The most relevant publications that have described analytical methods and published within the last 12 years were studied. Methods were compared, and the advantages and disadvantages of each methods were discussed. A total of 35 manuscripts describing analytical methods for glyphosate determination were summarized and discussed, with the most relevant one being compared. For methods that were not intended for biological samples, we discussed if they could be used for biomonitoring and approaches to adapt these methods for this purpose.

show abstract

Section: Difficulties In Laboratory Assessment Of Glyphosate—ongoing ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Difficulties In Laboratory Assessment Of Glyphosate—ongoing ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Methods and Strategies for Biomonitoring in Occupational Exposure to Plant Protection Products Containing Glyphosate

Moldovan

Imre

Duca

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, chromatographic techniques are widely used in pesticide detection due to their high efficiency in separating the pesticide molecules to be later detected by different techniques, which are characterized by high selectivity and sensitivity (Çakır & Baysal, 2019; Fama et al, 2023; Zhao et al, 2022). Chromatography separates chemical compounds based on their physical and chemical properties, such as their size, polarity, or affinity for certain molecules.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Sensitivity and Selectivity in Pesticide Detection: A Review of Cutting‐Edge Techniques

Ortiz‐Martínez,

Molina González,

Ramírez García

et al. 2024

Enviro Toxic and Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary goal of our review was to systematically explore and compare the state‐of‐the‐art methodologies employed in the detection of pesticides, a critical component of global food safety initiatives. New approach methods in the fields of luminescent nanosensors, chromatography, terahertz spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy are discussed as precise, rapid, and versatile strategies for pesticide detection in food items and agroecological samples. Luminescent nanosensors emerge as powerful tools, noted for their portability and unparalleled sensitivity and real‐time monitoring capabilities. Liquid and gas chromatography coupled to spectroscopic detectors, stalwarts in the analytical chemistry field, are lauded for their precision, wide applicability, and validation in diverse regulatory environments. Terahertz spectroscopy offers unique advantages such as noninvasive testing, profound penetration depth, and bulk sample handling. Meanwhile, Raman spectroscopy stands out with its nondestructive nature, its ability to detect even trace amounts of pesticides, and its minimal requirement for sample preparation. While acknowledging the maturity and robustness of these techniques, our review underscores the importance of persistent innovation. These methodologies' significance extends beyond their present functions, highlighting their adaptability to meet ever‐evolving challenges. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;00:1–17. © 2024 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

show abstract

Herbicide detection: A review of enzyme- and cell-based biosensors

Octobre,

Delprat,

Doumèche

et al. 2024

Environmental Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pesticides monitoring in biological fluids: Mapping the gaps in analytical strategies

Cited by 5 publications

References 165 publications

Methods and Strategies for Biomonitoring in Occupational Exposure to Plant Protection Products Containing Glyphosate

Methods and Strategies for Biomonitoring in Occupational Exposure to Plant Protection Products Containing Glyphosate

Enhancing Sensitivity and Selectivity in Pesticide Detection: A Review of Cutting‐Edge Techniques

Herbicide detection: A review of enzyme- and cell-based biosensors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About