2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2002.1239606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET and SPECT performance of the Siemens HD3 e.cam/sup duet//spl reg/ : a 1" Na(I) hybrid camera

Abstract: Siemens has recently developed a new PET/SPECT Dual Head camera, the e.cam duet® . This camera employs two HD3 detectors with 1" thick Na(I) segmented crystals. This design, relatively new for Na(I), is aimed at increasing the stopping power for 511 keV γ γ γ γ rays, while maintaining good spatial resolution for SPECT. The PET performance of this camera was evaluated using the new NEMA NU2-2001 specifications. The effect of the thicker crystal on the camera's performance in the single photon acquisition mode w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hybrid SPECT/ PET system employs 1.0-inch-thick segmented NaI crystals and 7.6 cm-long slat collimators. Operating in 2D mode with 18 F (similar to 2D PET imaging), the sensitivity was roughly 500 cps/MBq, corresponding to 18,500 cps/mCi (Sossi et al 2003). This represents a sensitivity difference of about a factor of 10,000:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hybrid SPECT/ PET system employs 1.0-inch-thick segmented NaI crystals and 7.6 cm-long slat collimators. Operating in 2D mode with 18 F (similar to 2D PET imaging), the sensitivity was roughly 500 cps/MBq, corresponding to 18,500 cps/mCi (Sossi et al 2003). This represents a sensitivity difference of about a factor of 10,000:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach that was pursued in the past involved modifications of the gamma camera energy range combined with coincidence electronics, serving as an alternative to dedicated PET systems (Miyaoka et al 1995, Patton and Turkington 1999, Sossi et al 2003. While the performance of these dual-head coincidence cameras were lower compared to dedicated PET systems, they served as a cost-effective approach to both nuclear medicine and PET imaging (Nellemann et al 1995, Kunze et al 2000, Schelper et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%