2009
DOI: 10.1002/hed.21147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET/CT in the assessment of previously treated skull base malignancies

Abstract: PET/CT is a highly sensitive test for malignant disease. The mucosal lining of the reconstructed skull base is a common source for inflammatory pathologies that may lead to false-positive PET/CT. Defining SUV thresholds for malignancy may improve specificity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following clinical routine, all PET/CT examinations were reviewed and reported by two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians with 6 and 11 years of experience in oncologic PET and PET/CT imaging. Visual interpretation of images was the preferred method in our institution, and similar to other institutional study protocols, standard uptake values (SUV) were not routinely measured 8,9 .…”
Section: Fdg Pet/ct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following clinical routine, all PET/CT examinations were reviewed and reported by two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians with 6 and 11 years of experience in oncologic PET and PET/CT imaging. Visual interpretation of images was the preferred method in our institution, and similar to other institutional study protocols, standard uptake values (SUV) were not routinely measured 8,9 .…”
Section: Fdg Pet/ct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Harvey et al, PET/CT scans were obtained at a minimum of 3 months after treatment, but specific timelines were not provided. Gil et al acquired the majority of their PET/CT scans (>80%) 6 months after treatment …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In their retrospective series, Harvey et al demonstrated that PET/CT can have excellent sensitivity and negative predict values (100%), but its functionality is hindered by poor specificity (40%) and PPV (53.8%) in the early postoperative period. 2 This limitation exists due to the inability of PET/CT to distinguish between tumor recurrence and inflammatory change (i.e., from surgery and/or radiation therapy), reducing its utility in the early surveillance setting. Gil et al also examined the role of PET/CT imaging for surveillance and reported specificity and PPV of 85% and 67%, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] An important advantage of PET/CT is that a whole-body scan allows for the detection of distant metastases and unexpected secondary cancers. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of the first posttreatment PET/CT scan with respect to overall survival (OS) in patients with malignancies of the paranasal sinuses and skull base. 12 Although PET/CT is now routinely used for HNSCC pretreatment and posttreatment evaluations, the clinical utility of the first posttreatment PET/CT scan for predicting tumor recurrence and survival of HNSCC had been evaluated in only few publications, and mostly in human papilloma virus-related tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%