2021
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET/CT Limitations and Pitfalls in Urogenital Cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The attractiveness of PET is attributed to its ability to identify genomic aberrations and the dysregulation of proteins [ 46 ], which cannot be detected by the previously described imaging modalities. Unfortunately, the evaluation of BCa with PET is difficult due to the accumulation of 18 F-FDG within the bladder from renal excretion, which obstructs the delineation of the tumor from the bladder wall and hinders the detection of BCa [ 49 ] ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Non-invasive Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attractiveness of PET is attributed to its ability to identify genomic aberrations and the dysregulation of proteins [ 46 ], which cannot be detected by the previously described imaging modalities. Unfortunately, the evaluation of BCa with PET is difficult due to the accumulation of 18 F-FDG within the bladder from renal excretion, which obstructs the delineation of the tumor from the bladder wall and hinders the detection of BCa [ 49 ] ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Non-invasive Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In penile cancer, FDG PET/CT is used for primary staging and for detection of recurrence [1][2][3][4]. Several pitfalls exist when reporting FDG PET/CT scans, including in urogenital malignancies5 and in infectious diseases 6,7. Only few case reports exist on FDG PET/CT in patients with syphilis [8][9][10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%