2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-020-01828-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pet dogs potential transmitters of pathogenic Escherichia coli with resistance to antimicrobials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that the phylogenetic group B2 was usually related with the uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) infection and the phylogenetic group D with the other extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) has been previously reported [ 61 , 62 ]. Our results are comparable with those of Vega-Manriquez et al [ 63 ], where the phylogroup analysis showed that a greater half (57%) of the E. coli isolates from the healthy dogs belonged to the commensal A and B1 groups, in contrast to the sick dogs, where the phylogroups D and B2 were dominant. In a study by Valat et al [ 64 ], most of the pathogenic E. coli in dogs from digestive pathologies were also assigned to the B2 phylogroup (58.6%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The observation that the phylogenetic group B2 was usually related with the uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) infection and the phylogenetic group D with the other extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) has been previously reported [ 61 , 62 ]. Our results are comparable with those of Vega-Manriquez et al [ 63 ], where the phylogroup analysis showed that a greater half (57%) of the E. coli isolates from the healthy dogs belonged to the commensal A and B1 groups, in contrast to the sick dogs, where the phylogroups D and B2 were dominant. In a study by Valat et al [ 64 ], most of the pathogenic E. coli in dogs from digestive pathologies were also assigned to the B2 phylogroup (58.6%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It has been reported that the prevalence of ESBL producers is higher in diarrheic animals than in healthy animals [ 31 , 32 ]. However, the prevalence of ESBL producers in healthy and diarrheic companion animals showed no significant difference in this study ( p > 0.05), but the frequent and uncontrolled defecation of diarrheic pets increases the likelihood of spread of the ESBL-producing E. coli to the owner [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…According to the virulence characteristics and clinical symptoms of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC), they have been further divided into five categories [ 4 ]: enteroinvasive (EIEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic (Shiga toxin-producing) (STEC), and enteroaggregative (EAEC). EPEC and ETEC strains have been reported from healthy or diarrhea companion animals [ 2 , 5 , 6 ]. EIEC are studied mainly in human infections [ 7 , 8 ], but studies in companion animals are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%