2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET standardized uptake values of primary lung cancer for comparison with tumor volume doubling times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are similar, fibrosis is a risk factor for lung cancer yet squamous cell cancer had only a slightly more rapid doubling time in fibrotic versus non-fibrotic lung, adenocarcinoma was not significantly different. Our results complimented Siddique et al with histology as the predominant driver of tumor doubling time [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results are similar, fibrosis is a risk factor for lung cancer yet squamous cell cancer had only a slightly more rapid doubling time in fibrotic versus non-fibrotic lung, adenocarcinoma was not significantly different. Our results complimented Siddique et al with histology as the predominant driver of tumor doubling time [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recent studies reported that the volume doubling time (VDT) and mass doubling time (MDT) were effective to re ect the GNN growth and useful for the therapy decision-making [7][8][9][10][11] . But these studies mainly treated the growth rate of GGNs as a biomarker of re ecting the malignant potential of the tumor [12][13][14][15][16] , not focusing on the investigation of the relationships between the times (i.e., VDT and MDT) and the clinic features. Some studies are concerned with using VDT/MDT to evaluate the GGO growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%