2016
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petersen Cores and the Oddness of Cubic Graphs

Abstract: Let G be a bridgeless cubic graph. Consider a list of k 1-factors of G. Let E i be the set of edges contained in precisely i members of the k 1-factors. Let µ k (G) be the smallest |E 0 | over all lists of k 1-factors of G. We study lists by three 1-factors, and call

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following results were already obtained in [4], but now it turns out that they are just a particular case of our previous theorem.…”
Section: The Weak Core Of a Cubic Graphsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The following results were already obtained in [4], but now it turns out that they are just a particular case of our previous theorem.…”
Section: The Weak Core Of a Cubic Graphsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, many others are still open, such as Conjecture 2.1 proposed independently by Berge and Fulkerson in the 1970s as well, and Conjecture 2.2 by Fan and Raspaud (see [10] and [7], respectively). These two conjectures are related to the behaviour of the union and intersection of sets of perfect matchings, and properties of this kind are already largely studied: see, amongst others, [1,2,15,16,17,19,22,23,25,30,31]. In this paper we prove that a seemingly stronger version of the Fan-Raspaud Conjecture is equivalent to the classical formulation (Theorem 3.3), and so to another interesting formulation proposed in [21] (see also [18]).…”
Section: Introduction and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Again, there is a striking difference between the trivial and the nontrivial snarks. Most cyclically 4-edge-connected snarks in Table 3 have µ 3 = 6, which is the minimal possible value for snarks with ω = 4, according to [15,Corollary 2.4]. By contrast, most trivial snarks from Table 4 have µ 3 > 6.…”
Section: Resistance and Other Measures Of Uncolourabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The values of the remaining invariants vary over the set M. It is quite remarkable that the automorphism group of every graph in M is a 2-group (or is trivial). The second group of invariants comprises those which are of particular interest for snarks: perfect matching index π, resistance ρ, weak oddness ω , and two invariants introduced in [15,26,27] and denoted by µ 3 and γ 2 ; see also [5] for a recent survey. The perfect matching index of a bridgeless cubic graph G, denoted by π(G) (also known as excessive index and denoted by χ e ), is the smallest number of perfect matchings that cover all the edges of G [2,7].…”
Section: Properties Of Graphs In Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation