2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petri type 2 fuzzy neural networks approximator for adaptive control of uncertain non‐linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results show the effectiveness of VMC on under actuated systems. Compared with similar studies [23], [38], [49] in the literature, the proposed control system is tested under more difficult conditions (the position of the cart is tested with a reference position of 0.2 m amplitude). According to the results obtained, maximum overshoot, car position error and pendulum angle error are much less than similar studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental results show the effectiveness of VMC on under actuated systems. Compared with similar studies [23], [38], [49] in the literature, the proposed control system is tested under more difficult conditions (the position of the cart is tested with a reference position of 0.2 m amplitude). According to the results obtained, maximum overshoot, car position error and pendulum angle error are much less than similar studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverted pendulum mechanism is mostly used as a benchmark system for control algorithms because of its nonlinear and under actuated nature. Wide variety of control techniques have been used to control this mechanism such as PID (Proportional, Integral and Derivative) [1]- [3], [44], [46], LQR (Linear Quadratic Regulator) [4], [5], Sliding Mode Control [6]- [11], Backstepping Control [12], [13], [45], Grey Prediction Control [14], Energy Based Control [15], [16], FLC (Fuzzy Logic Control) [17]- [20], NN (Neural Network) [21] and ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System) [22], [23]. Most of these control strategies are based on complex mathematical equations and the success of them is directly proportional to the precise acquisition of the mathematical model of the system [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. n h (49) where n h denotes the number of samples; e xh , e yh , e zh , e wh denote the tracking error for the h th sample. The parameters of the proposed controller consist of the following: σ init = 0.4, ∆σ = 0.05, n i = 3, n j = 4, n k = 1, D g = 0.2, D d = 0.02, and ϑ = 0.04; the sliding surface order is n = 2; the adaptive-learning rates areη w = 0.01,η m = 0.001,η σ = 0.001, andη r = 0.001.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the work of Peterson and Looney [44,45], Petri nets (PNs) and fuzzy PNs (FPNs) have been widely investigated in various fields [46][47][48][49][50]. A PN is a directed, weighted, and bipartite graph in which each node is either a place or a transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, several NN models and neural training schemes were applied to system controller design, and many promising results were presented [7, 8]. However, the NN has the shortcomings of slow learning speed, weak generalisation ability and unsatisfied robust performance [9, 10]. In short, the existing methods cannot fully solve the control problem of the non‐linear uncertain time‐varying system with time‐varying noise disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%