2014
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2014.948939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petro-structural geology of the Eastern Aspromonte Massif crystalline basement (southern Italy-Calabria): an example of interoperable geo-data management from thin section – to field scale

Abstract: The presented maps provide an example of the synoptic display of multi-scale geological features characterizing the tectono-metamorphic evolution of the crystalline basement terranes in a poly-orogenic-multistadial evolutionary scenario. The petro-structural map of the eastern Aspromonte Massif (southern Calabrian Peloritani Orogen) is characterized by a nappe-like edifice composed by the superimposition of three crystalline basement tectonic units which, sharing the same Alpine-Apennine reworking, underwent a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both granitoids and host rocks are locally affected by an Alpine overprint, at Ma [67,68] and P-T (pressure-temperature) peak conditions of~0.8 GPa at~600 • C in the southern sector of Peloritani Mountains [26,27,29] that produced pseudotachylytes and cataclastic to mylonitic rocks; furthermore, a weakly metamorphosed Mesozoic-Cenozoic sedimentary cover sandwiched between the Mandanici and Aspromonte units locally occurs ( [26]; and references therein). P-T conditions for the Variscan metamorphism, producing the main field foliation, are in the range of~0.5 GPa at~550-680 • C for the Aspromonte Unit in the Peloritani Mountains [69], similar to those obtained for rocks of the same unit in the Aspromonte Massif (0.4-0.5 GPa at 650-675 • C; [70,71]). Relatively high P peak values of 0.8 GPa at~600 • C~and of~0.9 GPa at~530 • C were obtained by [46,72], respectively, through thermodynamic modelling of garnet phyllites and schists, from both the Aspromonte and the underlying Mandanici Unit.…”
Section: Geo-petrological Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both granitoids and host rocks are locally affected by an Alpine overprint, at Ma [67,68] and P-T (pressure-temperature) peak conditions of~0.8 GPa at~600 • C in the southern sector of Peloritani Mountains [26,27,29] that produced pseudotachylytes and cataclastic to mylonitic rocks; furthermore, a weakly metamorphosed Mesozoic-Cenozoic sedimentary cover sandwiched between the Mandanici and Aspromonte units locally occurs ( [26]; and references therein). P-T conditions for the Variscan metamorphism, producing the main field foliation, are in the range of~0.5 GPa at~550-680 • C for the Aspromonte Unit in the Peloritani Mountains [69], similar to those obtained for rocks of the same unit in the Aspromonte Massif (0.4-0.5 GPa at 650-675 • C; [70,71]). Relatively high P peak values of 0.8 GPa at~600 • C~and of~0.9 GPa at~530 • C were obtained by [46,72], respectively, through thermodynamic modelling of garnet phyllites and schists, from both the Aspromonte and the underlying Mandanici Unit.…”
Section: Geo-petrological Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Relatively high P peak values of 0.8 GPa at~600 • C~and of~0.9 GPa at~530 • C were obtained by [46,72], respectively, through thermodynamic modelling of garnet phyllites and schists, from both the Aspromonte and the underlying Mandanici Unit. [70,71]). Relatively high P peak values of 0.8 GPa at ~600 °C ~ and of ~0.9 GPa at ~530 °C were obtained by [46,72], respectively, through thermodynamic modelling of garnet phyllites and schists, from both the Aspromonte and the underlying Mandanici Unit.…”
Section: Geo-petrological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These kinds of procedure, widely adopted in the literature (Amiotte-Suchet et al, 2003;Donnini et al, 2016;Dürr, Meybeck, & Dürr, 2005;Gibbs & Kump, 1994;Hartmann & Moosdorf, 2012), is different from the one used for geochemical mapping that requires (i) chemical/isotopic analyses of samples collected in the field and (ii) geoinformatic interpolation tools (e.g. Chiprés, Salinas, Castro-Larragoitia, & Monroy, 2008;Fiannacca et al, 2017;McKinley, 2013;Morris, Pirajno, & Shevchenko, 2003;Ortolano, Cirrincione, Pezzino, Tripodi, & Zappalà, 2015;Reimann et al, 1998;Smith, Cannon, Woodruff, Solano, & Ellefsen, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geological setting of the study area is characterized by the presence of different basement units, each with a different tectono-metamorphic evolution arranged in a nappe-pile stack, forming an allochthonous tectonic building piled up in the Oligocene -Lower Miocene (Amodio-Morelli et al, 1976;Cirrincione et al, 2015;Filice et al, 2015;Ortolano, Cirrincione, Pezzino, Tripodi, & Zappala, 2015;Tansi, Muto, Critelli, & Iovine, 2007;Van Dijk et al, 2000), which overthrusted the Mesozoic carbonate Unit of Apennine affinity ( Figure 2). The lower plate outcrops along the Coastal Range in several tectonic windows (Figure 2 (A)), among these the most extensive is represented by the Mt.…”
Section: Geology and Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%