2009
DOI: 10.1306/06120908163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petroleum reservoir porosity versus depth: Influence of geological age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical porosity-depth trends for siliciclastic reservoirs, show porosities of 10-15% at depths of 4000-5000 mbsf (Ehrenberg et al 2009). However, the Skagerrak reservoir sandstones retain remarkably good porosity, up to 35%, and a low degree of compaction with respect to their presentday depths of burial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical porosity-depth trends for siliciclastic reservoirs, show porosities of 10-15% at depths of 4000-5000 mbsf (Ehrenberg et al 2009). However, the Skagerrak reservoir sandstones retain remarkably good porosity, up to 35%, and a low degree of compaction with respect to their presentday depths of burial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8l). The importance of grain coating chlorite in preserving porosity has been recognized in many studies (Bloch et al, 2002;Ehrenberg et al, 2009;Ajdukiewicz and Lander, 2010;Tobin et al, 2010;Taylor et al, 2010;Ozkan et al, 2011;Deschamps et al, 2012;Nguyen et al, 2013). For Chang 8 sandstone, where chlorite rims are present, the formation of quartz overgrowths is actually inhibited and thus porosity being preserved (Fig.…”
Section: Chloritementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The estimation of decrease of K over age has been shown to exist [50], but quantification is not straightforward as the relation between porosity and age is influenced by many factors such as diagenesis, pressure, temperature, and erosion [51]. We chose to include a correction factor with age to exclude old (hard)rock, because an earlier study showed a more realistic distribution of aquifers throughout New Zealand by Tschritter et al (2016) [52].…”
Section: Appendix A4 Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%