2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petroleum spills and the communicative response from petroleum agencies and companies: Impact assessment from the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

Kingsley E. Ukhurebor,
Blessed F. Ngonso,
Peter E. Egielewa
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6: GasF activities in various nations using the sea and land surface temperature radiometer show the topmost twenty nations during 2017 [55]. 9…”
Section: Thermal Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6: GasF activities in various nations using the sea and land surface temperature radiometer show the topmost twenty nations during 2017 [55]. 9…”
Section: Thermal Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, one of the foremost difficulties confronting humanity is the environmental impact resulting from gas flaring (GasF) [1,2]; heavy metals [3][4][5]; dyes [6][7][8][9][10]; particulate matters [11]; petroleum or oil spills, toxic gases, and agricultural, domestic, and industrial chemicals/composites [12,13]; and other human-induced conditions [14]. These emissions are ordinarily found in the atmospheric environment (air), terrestrial environment (soil/land), and aquatic environment (water), and if not appropriately checked, their ensuing effects are generally disadvantageous [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While direct person-to-person contact is a major component of many debiasing and conflict resolution initiatives (Bruneau et al, 2022;Mousa, 2020;Paluck et al, 2019;Paolini et al, 2018), it can be logistically challenging for conflicting groups to accomplish these interactions, and they are frequently restricted to individuals who are already sufficiently motivated to meet "the enemy" in person (Bruneau et al, 2022). Technology offers substitutes for interpersonal communication ( (Ukhurebor et al, 2023;Hussaini et al, 2023;Asanga et al, 2023). Technology has been utilized, for instance, to enable computer-mediated or virtual contact among members of the rival group (Bruneau et al, 2022;Bruneau et al, 2021;Taylor et al, 2021) and to offer "parasocial" or vicarious contact (Bruneau et al, 2022); the latter involves exposing people to live or recorded audio or video media that contains information about the outgroup and its viewpoints (also known as a "media intervention").…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%