2014
DOI: 10.5194/se-5-45-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petrophysical constraints on the seismic properties of the Kaapvaal craton mantle root

Abstract: Abstract.We calculated the seismic properties of 47 mantle xenoliths from 9 kimberlitic pipes in the Kaapvaal craton based on their modal composition, the crystal-preferred orientations (CPO) of olivine, ortho-and clinopyroxene, and garnet, the Fe content of olivine, and the pressures and temperatures at which the rocks were equilibrated. These data allow constraining the variation of seismic anisotropy and velocities within the cratonic mantle. The fastest P and S 2 wave propagation directions and the polariz… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This kinematic change leads to a transition from transpressional to transtensional (TT) deformation regimes from the west to the east of the belt (Shabanian et al, ). The horizontal lineation and vertical foliation produced in SSD transpressional deformation (Baptiste & Tommasi, ; Fossen et al, ; Sullivan & Law, ; Tommasi et al, ) cause an aggregation of belt‐parallel lithospheric and NNR‐parallel asthenospheric splittings in central Alborz. Toward the eastern part of Alborz where the relative motion of SCB and central Iran are almost parallel with mountain trends, the deformation pattern changes to the SSD and PSD TT regimes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This kinematic change leads to a transition from transpressional to transtensional (TT) deformation regimes from the west to the east of the belt (Shabanian et al, ). The horizontal lineation and vertical foliation produced in SSD transpressional deformation (Baptiste & Tommasi, ; Fossen et al, ; Sullivan & Law, ; Tommasi et al, ) cause an aggregation of belt‐parallel lithospheric and NNR‐parallel asthenospheric splittings in central Alborz. Toward the eastern part of Alborz where the relative motion of SCB and central Iran are almost parallel with mountain trends, the deformation pattern changes to the SSD and PSD TT regimes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kinematic change leads to a transition from transpressional to transtensional (TT) deformation regimes from the west to the east of the belt (Shabanian et al, 2012). The horizontal lineation and vertical foliation produced in SSD transpressional deformation (Baptiste & Tommasi, 2014;Fossen et al, 1994;Sullivan & Law, 2007;Tommasi et al, 1999) cause an aggregation of (Lü et al, 2017). (b) The slope of the fitted second-order polynomial to the Alborz range trend is plotted by red line.…”
Section: 1029/2018tc005209mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3.2 we see the main basement faults In these areas, the SWS anisotropy directions may be due only to frozen anisotropy imprinted at the lithosphere, from past tectonic events, or they can be a compound effect of the asthenospheric anisotropy, generated by mantle flow, plus the lithospheric frozen anisotropy. Baptiste and Tommasi (2014) argues that small delays and null SWS measurements may result from vertical variations of seismic anisotropy, which could be the reason of the observed small delays and many null results in northern Brazil.…”
Section: Additional Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A null measurement is one where splitting cannot be detected for one of four reasons: there is no splitting or the polarization of the XKS wave is parallel or perpendicular to the orientation of the olivine foliation plane. A different and more complex type of anisotropy, such as orientations varying with depth, or tilted fast axes of the olivine crystals (Baptiste and Tommasi, 2014). Figure 1.3: Representation of a shear wave passing through an anisotropic medium.…”
Section: Shear Wave Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%