2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2016.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pex17p-dependent assembly of Pex14p/Dyn2p-subcomplexes of the peroxisomal protein import machinery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the proportion of proteins that are modified by DCU at a given site, intensities of DCU-modified peptides identified with a localization probability Ն0.9 were summed up per modified site. For identification of cross-linked peptides, the program pLink (49) was used essentially as described previously (50), however, taking into account zero-length cross-links (Ϫ18.0106 Da) between aspartate or glutamate and lysine or the N-terminal amino group as well as monolink modifications (ϩ206.1783 Da) of aspartate or glutamate. Relative quantification comparing DCCD-treated versus untreated samples for visualization was done by extracted ion chromatograms integrating the first three isotope peaks (mass tolerance 5 ppm) of each precursor ion using Xcalibur Qual Browser software (version 2.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Lc-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the proportion of proteins that are modified by DCU at a given site, intensities of DCU-modified peptides identified with a localization probability Ն0.9 were summed up per modified site. For identification of cross-linked peptides, the program pLink (49) was used essentially as described previously (50), however, taking into account zero-length cross-links (Ϫ18.0106 Da) between aspartate or glutamate and lysine or the N-terminal amino group as well as monolink modifications (ϩ206.1783 Da) of aspartate or glutamate. Relative quantification comparing DCCD-treated versus untreated samples for visualization was done by extracted ion chromatograms integrating the first three isotope peaks (mass tolerance 5 ppm) of each precursor ion using Xcalibur Qual Browser software (version 2.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Lc-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the former, MS raw data files were first converted to the Mascot generic format (mgf) using msConvert from ProteoWizard, release 3.0.9740 (74). Searches were performed against the forward and reversed amino acid sequences of the recombinant proteins with parameters and filtering criteria as described previously (75). In brief, cross-linked peptide matches were filtered at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5%, and a minimum E-value of 5 × 10 −2 rejecting adjacent tryptic peptides of the same protein.…”
Section: Cross-linking and Mass Spectrometry Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Pex17p is essential for peroxisomal import of both PTS1 and PTS2 proteins 14 . Strikingly, both import receptors, Pex5p and Pex7p, associate with the docking-complex (Pex13p, Pex14p) in absence of Pex17p, but with decreased efficiency 22 . Pex17p is apparently non-essential for receptor docking, but it increases the efficiency of the docking event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pex17p is tightly associated with Pex14p and thus with the docking-complex 21 , but its precise function remains unknown. Although Pex17p is part of the docking complex in yeast, it does not significantly contribute to the assembly of the Pex13p/Pex14p subcomplex 15,21,22 , and its counterpart in higher eukaryotes has not yet been identified. However, Pex17p is essential for peroxisomal import of both PTS1 and PTS2 proteins 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%