2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2009.5413511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PFID: Pittsburgh fast-food image dataset

Abstract: We introduce the first visual dataset of fast foods with a total of 4,545 still images, 606 stereo pairs, 303 360 0 videos for structure from motion, and 27 privacy-preserving videos of eating events of volunteers. This work was motivated by research on fast food recognition for dietary assessment. The data was collected by obtaining three instances of 101 foods from 11 popular fast food chains, and capturing images and videos in both restaurant conditions and a controlled lab setting. We benchmark the dataset… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collection is applicable to the problem at hand because it contains clusters of similar images, for example for outdoor environments, while maintaining a very broad category, in contrast to other datasets which are either too specific or too general (Toet et al, 2001;Deng et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2009). Indoor surroundings with similar characteristics can also be found, so we were able to identify similar images from this set.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The collection is applicable to the problem at hand because it contains clusters of similar images, for example for outdoor environments, while maintaining a very broad category, in contrast to other datasets which are either too specific or too general (Toet et al, 2001;Deng et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2009). Indoor surroundings with similar characteristics can also be found, so we were able to identify similar images from this set.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…ColourH [28] 11.3% OM [28] 28.2% BoW [27] 30.6% PRICoLBP [29] 45.4% SIFT + LLC [30] 44.63% SIFT + LDC + LLC [30] 48.45% We also tested the proposed framework with IFV and compared performance with LLC intuitively. From results, we can see SIFT + IFV shows 2% higher accuracy than SIFT + LLC.…”
Section: Methods Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the experimental protocol proposed by Chen et al and performed 3-fold cross-validation for the experiments, only using the 12 images from two instances for training and the other 6 images from the third for testing [27]. We repeated this procedure three times, with a different instance serving as the test set and averaged the results.…”
Section: Experiments On Pfid Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the best known works based on local features was presented in [9]. The authors combined three algorithms.…”
Section: Vision-based Techniques For Food Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%