2012
DOI: 10.3790/sfo.61.7.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pflege und Erwerbstätigkeit – Eine lebensverlaufstheoretische Perspektive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, with regard to upward and lateral care, the formal provision of services directly to the care‐receiver (care‐in‐kind) should enable caregivers to remain in employment because their care provision is less likely to be intensive and more likely to complement formal services. Second, policy schemes that enable informal caregivers to take care of their relatives (cash‐for‐care) should lead to caregivers giving up employment, because they motivate predominantly those individuals with a weak labour market attachment to take over caregiving duties, which are then often intensive and time‐consuming (Czaplicki, 2012; Frericks, Jensen, & Pfau‐Effinger, 2014; Le Bihan et al, 2019). We thus formulate the following hypothesis with regard to upward and lateral care:H2 Higher expenditure for cash‐for‐care increases upward and lateral caregivers' labour market exits and decreases their working hours, care‐in‐kind expenditure decreases upward and lateral caregivers' labour market exits and increases their working hours .…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Previous Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, with regard to upward and lateral care, the formal provision of services directly to the care‐receiver (care‐in‐kind) should enable caregivers to remain in employment because their care provision is less likely to be intensive and more likely to complement formal services. Second, policy schemes that enable informal caregivers to take care of their relatives (cash‐for‐care) should lead to caregivers giving up employment, because they motivate predominantly those individuals with a weak labour market attachment to take over caregiving duties, which are then often intensive and time‐consuming (Czaplicki, 2012; Frericks, Jensen, & Pfau‐Effinger, 2014; Le Bihan et al, 2019). We thus formulate the following hypothesis with regard to upward and lateral care:H2 Higher expenditure for cash‐for‐care increases upward and lateral caregivers' labour market exits and decreases their working hours, care‐in‐kind expenditure decreases upward and lateral caregivers' labour market exits and increases their working hours .…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Previous Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The employment status of a potential family caregiver is an important factor as well. People with a lower labor market attachment have a higher probability of starting family care (Czaplicki, 2012(Czaplicki, , 2020. The opportunity cost of starting caregiving might explain this effect of labor market status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%