2007
DOI: 10.1024/1012-5302.20.3.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pflegediagnosen bei Patienten und Patientinnen psychiatrischer Aufnahmestationen in der Schweiz und in Österreich: Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede

Abstract: In Austria and Switzerland, nursing diagnoses in psychiatric nursing have been used increasingly over the last few years. To date, few empirical studies on the clinical use of nursing diagnoses in psychiatric nursing have been conducted. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency and content of documented nursing diagnoses and to compare the utilization of nursing diagnoses in Austria and Switzerland. We prospectively registered all documented nursing diagnoses in an unselected sample of 330 patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this study might have yielded different results in other organisations or settings. However, in Austria, compared with other countries [ 46 48 ], the nursing diagnoses are implemented in a more uniform way due to mandatory legislative requirements (GuKG, 1997) [ 16 ]. Before broader implementation of NMDS-AT in another hospital, the NMDS-AT should be tested in paper-based form to test data availability and extraction guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study might have yielded different results in other organisations or settings. However, in Austria, compared with other countries [ 46 48 ], the nursing diagnoses are implemented in a more uniform way due to mandatory legislative requirements (GuKG, 1997) [ 16 ]. Before broader implementation of NMDS-AT in another hospital, the NMDS-AT should be tested in paper-based form to test data availability and extraction guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%