Pflegeroboter aus Sicht der Geriatrie

Gisinger, Christoph

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22698-5_6

Cited by 14 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although there is a broad societal understanding that robotic systems are not intended to replace personal interaction in health and social care, these fears have to be taken seriously in any phase of research. 47 48 The implementation of innovations is difficult when the actual outcomes do not meet users’ expectations. To overcome this barrier, discussions about possible functions and limitations should start early and follow an iterative process to involve individual perceptions and to moderate expectations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundRobots in healthcare are gaining increasing attention; however, their implementation is challenging due to the complexity of both interventions themselves and the contexts in which they are implemented. The objective of this integrative review is to identify barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic systems in nursing.MethodsArticles published from 2002 to 2019 reporting on projects to implement robotic devices in nursing care were searched on Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL and databases on funded research projects (Community Research and Development Information Services and Technische Informationsbibliothek) and in journals for robotic research in November 2017 and July 2019 for an update. No restrictions regarding study designs were imposed. All included articles underwent quality assessments with design-specific critical appraisal tools. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were classified using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework.ResultsAfter removing all duplicates, the search revealed 11 204 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. The majority of the studies dealt with the implementation of robots designed to support individuals, either living at home or in nursing homes (n=11). The studies were conducted in Europe, the USA and New Zealand and were carried out in nursing homes, individual living environments, hospital units and laboratories. The quality of reporting and quality of evidence were low in most studies. The most frequently reported barriers were in socioeconomic and ethical domains and were within the implementation outcomes domain. The most frequently reported facilitators were related to the sociocultural context, implementation process and implementation strategies.DiscussionThis review identified barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic devices in nursing within different dimensions. The results serve as a basis for the development of suitable implementation strategies to reduce potential barriers and promote the integration of elements to facilitate implementation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018073486.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Publications suggest that older people in care settings were receptivetothe use of robotics (Gisinger 2018;Früh/Gasser 2018). In arecentpublication, the German Ethics Council (2020) summarizes that overall, the public has ap ositive attitude towards new technologiesa nd robotics.…”

Section: Technology Acceptancementioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization and new technologies in care – concepts and potentials for nursing care provision

Hasseler¹

2022

Digitalisierung Der Pflege

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundIn Germany,wehaveahigh demand for nursing care on the one hand and,onthe other hand ahuge shortageofnurses. For the area of long-termcare, it is forecast that there will be as hortageo fn ursing staff of around 307,000 individuals by 2035. This results in asupply gap of about 500,000 nurses in the overall nursing care sector (Radke 2020). Schwinger et al. (2019) projectthat if the trend for the need of nursing care is extrapolated, it will increase from 590,000 individuals in 2019 to 720,000 by 2030 and to 980,000 individuals employed in nursing care by 2060. In relativet erms, this represents an increase of 67%. Differentiated into inpatientand outpatient care, these projections meanthat about 100,000 more positions will be needed in inpatient long-term care alone, and about 700,000 individuals should be employed in care by 2060, to meet the demand. In ambulatory care, an increase in needed staff of 220,000 is projected by 2030 (Schwinger et al. 2019). In these projections, however, it must be taken into account that as hortage of nurses can also be observed in hospitalsa nd rehabilitation clinics.Against this background, the hope is that new technology will, and can, support nurses in their work. To date, however, there has been little research conducted on required competencies for nurses to work appropriately with new technologies in nursing (Maalouf et al. 2018). Professional nursing will haveto meet new requirements in terms of professional competencies, as they will not only havetoidentify nursing needs, but will also havetobeable to plan, and use, the new technologies in line with the needs of the person in need of care, so that high-quality health and nursing care can be provided. The unanswered questions about new technologies in nursing care include: Why do we need them? To compensatefor nursing staff shortages and/or to optimize nursingprocesses? To support and/or facilitate nursing work?T osupport the autonomy, independence and self-determination of people in need of care?F urther questions are: What new technologies do we need?What does the human-technology interaction look Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY 4.0

show abstract

“…Technische Errungenschaften wie Assistenzroboter oder Mobilitätshilfen können die Autonomie alter Menschen unterstützen, zu ihrer Sicherheit beitragen und Caregiver entlasten. Intelligente technische Systeme können zum Unterhaltungspartner werden, Gefühle der Einsamkeit minimieren und die häusliche und stationäre Pflege sinnvoll unterstützen (Früh & Gasser, 2018, S. 45;Gisinger, 2018). Nach ihren Ansprüchen an eine kompetente Pflegekraft gefragt, nennen alte Menschen jedoch gefühlsbetonte Schlagworte wie Mitgefühl, Zärtlichkeit, Achtsamkeit oder Trost in schwierigen Zeiten (Kreis, 2018, S. 223).…”

Section: Fazit Für Caregiverunclassified

Menschsein in einer technisierten Welt – Einleitende Bemerkungen zu einer interdisziplinären Auseinandersetzung mit der digitalen Transformation

Puzio¹,

Rutzmoser²,

Endres³

2022

Menschsein in Einer Technisierten Welt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar.© Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung, die nicht ausdrücklich vom Urheberrechtsgesetz zugelassen ist, bedarf der vorherigen Zustimmung des Verlags. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Bearbeitungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen. Die Wiedergabe von allgemein beschreibenden Bezeichnungen, Marken, Unternehmensnamen etc. in diesem Werk bedeutet nicht, dass diese frei durch jedermann benutzt werden dürfen. Die Berechtigung zur Benutzung unterliegt, auch ohne gesonderten Hinweis hierzu, den Regeln des Markenrechts. Die Rechte des jeweiligen Zeicheninhabers sind zu beachten. Der Verlag, die Autoren und die Herausgeber gehen davon aus, dass die Angaben und Informationen in diesem Werk zum Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung vollständig und korrekt sind. Weder der Verlag noch die Autoren oder die Herausgeber übernehmen, ausdrücklich oder implizit, Gewähr für den Inhalt des Werkes, etwaige Fehler oder Äußerungen. Der Verlag bleibt im Hinblick auf geografische Zuordnungen und Gebietsbezeichnungen in veröffentlichten Karten und Institutionsadressen neutral.

show abstract

Pflegeroboter aus Sicht der Geriatrie

Cited by 14 publications

References 19 publications

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

Digitalization and new technologies in care – concepts and potentials for nursing care provision

Menschsein in einer technisierten Welt – Einleitende Bemerkungen zu einer interdisziplinären Auseinandersetzung mit der digitalen Transformation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About