2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pH-dependence of signaling-state formation in Drosophila cryptochrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, CRYD binds to TIM more tightly than lightstate CRY (with a K D in the 1-mM range), indicating that for the WT protein, the lower light-state affinity may be due to incomplete light activation. A contributing factor to incomplete conversion may be that the pH environment of the cell converts some of the flavin ASQ to the NSQ (Einholz et al, 2021), thereby reducing the amount of CRY bound to TIM in light. Furthermore, some apo CRY during overexpression (which we estimate could be as high as 25%) will not contribute to TIM binding but will register in the free sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CRYD binds to TIM more tightly than lightstate CRY (with a K D in the 1-mM range), indicating that for the WT protein, the lower light-state affinity may be due to incomplete light activation. A contributing factor to incomplete conversion may be that the pH environment of the cell converts some of the flavin ASQ to the NSQ (Einholz et al, 2021), thereby reducing the amount of CRY bound to TIM in light. Furthermore, some apo CRY during overexpression (which we estimate could be as high as 25%) will not contribute to TIM binding but will register in the free sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose that these changes in the H-bonding network surrounding the FAD trigger changes in H-bonding at the N(5)H and N(3)H that we detect with the rR spectroscopy. Previously, we proposed that these changes resulted in an increase in FADH − /FADH• reduction potential and, consequently, to a ~ 2-fold decrease in an electron transfer rate and ~ 10-fold stabilization of FADH − [28,44]. Such changes are insufficient to fully explain the order in magnitude change in the rate of FADH• oxidation in VcCRY-1 upon substrate-binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the plant CRY subfamily with an FAD ox dark state and FADH• signaling state, it is an aspartate that may donate the proton to the FAD N(5) to form FADH• from FAD• − along with destabilizing a negatively charged FADH − [23][24][25]. The proximal amino acid in the animal CRY subfamily is a cysteine which appears to allow formation of an FAD•signaling state from the FAD ox dark state, though this debate has not been settled [26][27][28]. The CRY-DASH subfamily has an asparagine, just like PL [29], which raises the question how CRY-DASH accesses the presumptive FAD ox dark-state for its signaling function, if that is a requirement, and how it returns back to FADH• and FADH − for its DNA-repair function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CRYΔ binds to TIM more tightly than light-state CRY (with a KD in the 1 µM range), indicating that for the WT protein, the lower light-state affinity may be due to incomplete light-activation. A contributing factor to incomplete conversion may be that the pH environment of the cell converts some of the flavin ASQ to the NSQ (Einholz et al, 2021), thereby reducing the amount of CRY bound to TIM in light.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%