1980
DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.1980.0280602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pH-Independent and pH-Dependent Surface Charges on Kaolinite

Abstract: Abstract--Model cation-exchange curves are presented for an idealized kaolinite surface where the charge on the surface (1) has its origin in cation substitution in the structure, and hence, is pH independent; and (2) is produced by protonation/deprotonation reactions of oxide-like sites, and hence, depends on the acid and base strengths of the surface sites, as welt as the ionic strength. Two pH-independent situations are considered: one where the exchanging ions have no selectivity for the surface and are al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural kaolinites do, however, have a small cation-exchange capacity, generally < 0.02 mol charge kg-i in chemically pure kaolinites (Talibudeen, 1981;Parfitt, 1978;Sposito, 1984Sposito, , 1989 and thus, the surface properties of kaolinite share characteristics with both oxides and smectites. Weak, cation exchange-type sorption observed in macroscopic studies of kaolinite is generally attributed to two factors: either isomorphic substitution of AI 3 § for Si 4 § in the tetrahedral sheet giving rise to a negative structural charge or contamination by small amounts of2:1 phyllosilicate minerals (Schofield and Samson, 1954;Bolland et al, 1976Bolland et al, , 1980Ferris and Jepson, 1975;van Olphen, 1977;Sposito, 1984;Schindler et ak, 1987;Wieland and Stumm, 1992). Several experimental studies suggest that both factors may contribute to ion exchange (Jepson and Rowse, 1975;Lee et al, 1975;Lim et al, 1980;Talibudeen and Goulding, 1983).…”
Section: Sorption and Sorption Sites On Kaolinitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural kaolinites do, however, have a small cation-exchange capacity, generally < 0.02 mol charge kg-i in chemically pure kaolinites (Talibudeen, 1981;Parfitt, 1978;Sposito, 1984Sposito, , 1989 and thus, the surface properties of kaolinite share characteristics with both oxides and smectites. Weak, cation exchange-type sorption observed in macroscopic studies of kaolinite is generally attributed to two factors: either isomorphic substitution of AI 3 § for Si 4 § in the tetrahedral sheet giving rise to a negative structural charge or contamination by small amounts of2:1 phyllosilicate minerals (Schofield and Samson, 1954;Bolland et al, 1976Bolland et al, , 1980Ferris and Jepson, 1975;van Olphen, 1977;Sposito, 1984;Schindler et ak, 1987;Wieland and Stumm, 1992). Several experimental studies suggest that both factors may contribute to ion exchange (Jepson and Rowse, 1975;Lee et al, 1975;Lim et al, 1980;Talibudeen and Goulding, 1983).…”
Section: Sorption and Sorption Sites On Kaolinitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also stated by another study that the charge from broken edges and exposed OH planes rather than charge from Al/Si substitution determines the kaolinite CEC, even at zero point charge, and that a high CEC in some kaolinites is found to be due to smectite layers on the surface of the kaolinite crystals [4]. However, it is indicated by other researches that the negative charge on kaolinite cannot be attributed to an oxide-like source only, and the partial dissolution of structural aluminum yielding negatively charged vacant sites must also be considered [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third view is that aluminosilicate gel coatings, rich in silica, may exist on the surface, conferring a negative charge on the basal surface that becomes more negative with increasing pH. It is the variation of these different charge contributions at the basal surfaces and at the edges with pH and ionic strength that is used to account theoretically for the measured changes in electrophoretic mobility, surface charge, and extrapolated yield strength as a function ofpH and ionic strength (Diz and Rand, 1989;Bolland et al, 1980;Rand and Melton, 1977;van Olphen, 1977;Schofield and Samson, 1954). The hydroxyl groups at the plate edges are considered to be the major reactive sites (Morris et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%