2002
DOI: 10.1177/000456320203900603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phaeochromocytoma with Normal Urinary Catecholamines: The Potential Value of Urinary Free Metadrenalines

Abstract: Background Normal urine catecholamine values in patients with phaeochromocytoma is an occasional finding and may lead to a missed diagnosis. Additional urinary free metadrenaline analysis may be of value in this situation. Methods In addition to vanillylmandelic acid, homovanillic acid and the catecholamines, urinary free normetadrenaline (fNMA) and free metadrenaline (fMA) were measured. This report describes six confirmed cases of phaeochromocytoma showing normal urinary catecholamine output and compares fMA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This secretion is independent of highly variable catecholamine release caused by the tumour or by sympathoadrenal excitation (35). Comparisons of different biochemical tests established that both plasma free metanephrines or urinary fractionated metanephrines offer a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of PPGL than other traditional tests (24,25,33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41). Plasma free metanephrines offers a sensitivity up to 96-99% (Table 2).…”
Section: Which Test Is the Best?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This secretion is independent of highly variable catecholamine release caused by the tumour or by sympathoadrenal excitation (35). Comparisons of different biochemical tests established that both plasma free metanephrines or urinary fractionated metanephrines offer a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of PPGL than other traditional tests (24,25,33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41). Plasma free metanephrines offers a sensitivity up to 96-99% (Table 2).…”
Section: Which Test Is the Best?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…23 Such data may be normalized, for example by logarithmic transformation or by employing non-parametric statistics. 15,16,22,23 The upper reference limits for urinary catecholamines and metabolites used in the present study were established taking account of both factors. In addition, we determined their practical validity by a peer-reviewed study using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, 11 and our URL values are similar or identical to those quoted by several other laboratories employing HPLC techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The reference intervals for adults were NA (,900 nmol/24 h), AD (,230 nmol/24 h), DA (,3300 nmol/24 h), 16 VMA (,35 mmol/24 h), HVA (,40 mmol/24 h), 17 fNMA (,650 nmol/24 h) and fMA (,350 nmol/24 h). 15 In the case of random urines from children, results were expressed as millimole per mole creatinine, and the various age-related upper reference limits were as previously described. 14 Statistical analysis was performed using the MedCalc statistical software package (version 11.3.3.; MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With improved analytical sensitivity of modern LC-ECD and LC-MS/MS instruments, it has become possible to measure urine free metanephrines (16,24 ), which also provide improved diagnosis of PPGLs compared to catecholamines and VMA (25 ). Such measurements not only avoid the quality assurance problems associated with measurements of deconjugated metanephrines, but also offer theoretical advantages related to measurements of free metabolites formed within chromaffin cells and their tumor derivatives (18,23 ).…”
Section: Free Vs Conjugated Metanephrinesmentioning
confidence: 99%