1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1994.tb00234.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phage-host interactions in soil

Abstract: Phages are abundant and ubiquitous in nature, and are therefore important components of microbial communities. They can impact on host populations in several ways, including predation and alteration of host phenotype by genetic interactions. The dynamic survival of phage populations in soil requires infective interactions with host populations which must be undergoing growth. Hence survival is limited by the activity of soil bacteria, and phage populations must adopt strategies to overcome periods of inactivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a mechanism could also lead to reduced viral adsorption coefficients in prokaryotic virus-host systems. In addition, it has been argued that inhibitors such as endolysins released during lysis may sweep receptors on prokaryotes (Marsh and Wellington 1994), also resulting in reduced viral adsorption coefficients. As inhibitors are probably released concomitantly with viruses, such mechanisms should be strongest in summer when viral abundance and viral infection rates were high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a mechanism could also lead to reduced viral adsorption coefficients in prokaryotic virus-host systems. In addition, it has been argued that inhibitors such as endolysins released during lysis may sweep receptors on prokaryotes (Marsh and Wellington 1994), also resulting in reduced viral adsorption coefficients. As inhibitors are probably released concomitantly with viruses, such mechanisms should be strongest in summer when viral abundance and viral infection rates were high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it makes evolutionary sense that lysogeny is an adaptation to low host abundance, an explanation is required for the finding of low FLC values at high bacterial abundance, since there is no a priori reason why lysogeny should be disadvantageous in such conditions. The number of genomes of a prophage population depends on the replication rate of the host resulting in one additional viral genome per cell division (Marsh and Wellington 1994), whereas lysis results in multiple genome copies determined by the burst size. At the community level, prophage replication rate was only two times higher in surface waters than in mesopelagic and deep waters, whereas viral production was about two orders of magnitude higher (Table 1).…”
Section: Relationship Between Lysogeny and Lytic Viral Infection-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral lysis might also influence species diversity by ''killing the winner'' (Thingstad and Lignell 1997) and keeping in check competitive dominants . Lysogeny confers some immunity against infection by related phages, and prophages can also change the metabolic properties of hosts and by that the fitness of lysogens (Marsh and Wellington 1994). This may result in virus-induced changes of species diversity as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysogeny is characterized by two distinct phases that could influence the BCC with contrasting outcomes. The establishment of lysogeny confers immunity against infection by the same or closely related phages, and prophages can also change the growth properties of their host (Levin and Lenski, 1983;Marsh and Wellington, 1994), generally leading to the increase in their abundance (Edlin et al, 1975;Paul, 2008). Here, we propose that these benefits of lysogeny also exist within natural bacterioplankton, probably conferring a selective advantage to some groups that will eventually become abundant in the community.…”
Section: Changes In Bcc Upon Induction and Ecological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 83%