Phakic refractive lens experience in Spain

Hoyos, Jairo; Dementiev, Dimitrii; Cigales, Melania; Hoyos-Chacón, Jairo; Hoffer, Kenneth J.

doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01439-6

Cited by 62 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This indicates that these highly myopic patients improved their final visual acuity (postoperate BSCVA) although its mean is 0.7 (logMAR equivalent) with better BSCVA. These results are comparable to or better than those obtained in other isolated pIOL series [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and to those of cataract surgery with IOL implantation in high myopia. 20 The most appropriate pIOL should be determined by its visual results and complications in prospective comparative studies and not only by isolated series reports.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Correction of high myopia with the PRL phakic intraocular lens

Donoso¹,

Castillo²

2006

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Correction of high myopia with the PRL phakic intraocular lens

Donoso¹,

Castillo²

2006

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…42,48 In addition, any condition associated to a potential zonular weakening should be also considered as a contraindication for the implantation of PRL, such as history of ocular trauma with secondary zonular damage, Marfań s syndrome diagnosis, or other systemic illnesses characterized by fragility of the cilliary processes. 37 A preoperative evaluation of the zonule by means of ultrasound technology is recommended in order to confirm structural integrity.…”

Section: Preoperative Assessment and Patient Selection For Prl Implanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…26,[29][30][31][32]38,42 Hoyos et al 42 . After surgery, mean SE in the myopic group was À 0.31 ± 0.51 D and À 0.60 ± 0.63 D in the hyperopic group.…”

Section: Refractive Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL): a review

Pérez-Cambrodí

Piñero

Ferrer-Blasco

et al. 2012

Eye

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implantation of phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) is a reversible refractive procedure, preserving the patient's accommodative function with minimal induction of higher order aberrations compared with corneal photoablative procedures. Despite this, as an intraocular procedure, it has potential risks such as cataracts, chronic uveitis, pupil ovalization, corneal endothelial cell loss, pigmentary dispersion syndrome, pupillary block glaucoma, astigmatism, or endophthalmitis. Currently, only two models of posterior chamber pIOLs are commercially available, the implantable collammer lens (STAAR Surgical Co.) and the phakic refractive lens (PRL; Zeiss Meditec). The number of published reports on the latter is very low, and some concerns still remain about its long-term safety. The present article reviews the published literature on the outcomes after PRL implantation in order to provide a general overview and evaluate its real potential as a surgical refractive option.

show abstract

“…11,26 In our cases, contact between the PIOL and the anterior capsule was responsible for an asymptomatic subcapsular anterior opacity, whose time of presentation does not support surgical trauma as cause. The IOL used in the present series is commercialized both for phakic and aphakic eyes and has a reduced haptic angulation compared with the new hyperopic Morcher PIOL (Z-SAL 4 Plus), which was not available at the time of the study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 57%

“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Refractive lens exchange is, however, irreversible and causes loss of accommodation.…”

Section: Q 2005 Ascrs and Escrsmentioning

confidence: 99%