2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phantom and big-fish-little-pond-effects on academic self-concept and academic achievement: Evidence from English early primary schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
19
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in contrast to previous studies, we found that an effect of average achievement composition persisted in almost all model specificationsthis was also the case when additionally controlling for selection bias at the individual level. At least for the German context, the conclusions of recent studies (Dicke et al, 2018;Televantou et al, 2015Televantou et al, , 2021-namely that achievement composition and peer spillover effects are mere phantom effects that disappear when controlling for measurement error-has to be rejected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, in contrast to previous studies, we found that an effect of average achievement composition persisted in almost all model specificationsthis was also the case when additionally controlling for selection bias at the individual level. At least for the German context, the conclusions of recent studies (Dicke et al, 2018;Televantou et al, 2015Televantou et al, , 2021-namely that achievement composition and peer spillover effects are mere phantom effects that disappear when controlling for measurement error-has to be rejected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, we had strong covariates following established standards in the literature regarding how to control for individual-level selection bias in achievement composition effects on achievement development; these standards require the researcher to control for the pretreatment measure to remove most selection bias problems (e.g., Steiner et al, 2010). We additionally included a measure of cognitive ability to control for the preexisting interindividual cognitive differences that are important for achievement development-this likewise went beyond controls applied in previous studies (e.g., Dicke et al, 2018;Harker & Tymms, 2004;Televantou et al, 2015Televantou et al, , 2021. 5 At least for the German setting, previous research has shown that adding measures of general cognitive ability in combination with social background measures helps to properly correct for selection bias in estimating composition effects, especially when the measures are only proxies for the specific selection into treatment (Baumert et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodological Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The English Self-concept Scale has good psychometric properties in the respects of internal consistency and constructs validity. These items were partially taken from the Academic Self-description Questionnaire Ⅱ (Marsh, 2007) and it has been utilized in quite a few studies to investigate tie-up with academic achievement (Guo, Parker et al, 2015; Marsh & Martin, 2011; Televantou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasil tersebut sejalan dengan teori yang dikemukakan Epstein bahwa selfconcept dapat mempengaruhi perilaku seseorang dalam menggapai tujuan yang diharapkan, secara spesifik terkait dengan pencapaian prestasi akademik. Hasil penelitian terdahulu terkait pengaruh self-concept terhadap prestasi akademik juga turut memperkuat hasil penelitian ini, yang menyatakan bahwa self-concept mempengaruhi prestasi akademik (Chae, 2018); (Klapp, 2018); (Sticca, 2017); (Televantou, 2021); (Toraman et al, 2020).…”
Section: B Pengaruh Self-concept Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswaunclassified