1999
DOI: 10.4064/fm-161-1-2-37-91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phantom maps and purity in modular representation theory, I

Abstract: Let k be a field and G a finite group. By analogy with the theory of phantom maps in topology, a map f : M → N between kG-modules is said to be phantom if its restriction to every finitely generated submodule of M factors through a projective module. We investigate the relationships between the theory of phantom maps, the algebraic theory of purity, and Rickard's idempotent modules. In general, adding one to the pure global dimension of kG gives an upper bound for the number of phantoms we need to compose to g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This material is taken mostly from Rickard's paper [12]. Variations on the theme and other accounts, can be found in [8], [6] and the last section of [5])…”
Section: Idempotent Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This material is taken mostly from Rickard's paper [12]. Variations on the theme and other accounts, can be found in [8], [6] and the last section of [5])…”
Section: Idempotent Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the few cases where End C (k) has been computed, it turned out to be some sort of homogeneous localization of the cohomology ring of the group (see [12], [8], [5]). However, in all of those examples, the localization is with respect to a thick tensor ideal determined by a subvariety that is a hypersurface or union of hypersurfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here they serve a dual purpose: the one just mentioned and that of replacing minimal A-approximations in case such approximations fail to exist. Our phantoms under (3) below are not to be confused with the phantom maps of algebraic topology, or the topology-inspired phantom maps in the modular representation theory of groups, as introduced by Benson and Gnacadja in [4].…”
Section: Background On Contravariant Finiteness and Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neeman [N] introduced this concept into the context of triangulated categories. The theory also was developed in the stable category of a finite group ring in a series of works of Benson and Gnacadja [BG1,BG2,G].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%