1992
DOI: 10.1080/10826079208018847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical Drug Separations by HPCE: Practical Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the separation factor a for 1-phenylethanol was the same at all buffer concentrations (a = 1.030 f O.OOS), but an increase of the buffer concentration from 2.5 mM to 50 mM resulted in a reduced K of the analytes and, consequently, in a decrease of R, from 1.51 (2.5 mM) to 1.16 (50 mM) [15]. As a compromise, a buffer of medium concentration (20 mM) was chosen to facilitate changes from low to higher voltages.…”
Section: S Mayer and V Schurigmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the separation factor a for 1-phenylethanol was the same at all buffer concentrations (a = 1.030 f O.OOS), but an increase of the buffer concentration from 2.5 mM to 50 mM resulted in a reduced K of the analytes and, consequently, in a decrease of R, from 1.51 (2.5 mM) to 1.16 (50 mM) [15]. As a compromise, a buffer of medium concentration (20 mM) was chosen to facilitate changes from low to higher voltages.…”
Section: S Mayer and V Schurigmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Here, just as with achiral conditions, high buffer concentrations lower the mobility of the analytes [15], whereas at low buffer concentrations the current is strongly reduced (2.5 m~/ 3 PA; 20 mrd10 pA; 50 m~/ 4 2 pA, measured with Chirasil-P-Dex at 30 kV). Interestingly, the separation factor a for 1-phenylethanol was the same at all buffer concentrations (a = 1.030 f O.OOS), but an increase of the buffer concentration from 2.5 mM to 50 mM resulted in a reduced K of the analytes and, consequently, in a decrease of R, from 1.51 (2.5 mM) to 1.16 (50 mM) [15].…”
Section: S Mayer and V Schurigmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Because addition of organic solvents to the running buffers changes the zeta potential, viscosity, dielectric constant, and permittivity, and can improve the selectivity, resolution, and peak symmetry [33,34], several were used to optimize the separation of isomeric compounds which were not resolved by use of the coelectroosmotic aqueous systems [10,18,19,23].…”
Section: Effect Of Various Organic Solventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the use of buffer solutions with high ionic strength can produce undesired effects related to the generation of heat. If the heat is not properly dissipated by the capillary, the viscosity of the buffer and the electrophoretic mobility of the analytes can be modified, bringing about variations in the efficiency and resolution of the separations [6,15,391. In an extreme case, the high temperatures inside the capillary can produce the denaturation of the biopolymers [40].…”
Section: Peptide Behavior Depending On Ionic Strength Of Buffermentioning
confidence: 99%