Aust J Gen Pract 2020
DOI: 10.31128/ajgp-08-19-5041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical industry payments to leaders of professional medical associations in Australia: Focus on cardiovascular disease and diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After data collection, a descriptive analysis of payment data was conducted overall and by the demographic characteristics, including average and median monetary values per physician and the proportion of physicians receiving payments. Then, as previous studies repeatedly found, 16,[25][26][27] there was a significant difference in the payments between general physicians and leading physicians, namely, key opinion leaders, we performed the multivariable modified log-linked Poisson by the generalized estimating equations, as described in our previous study. 14 The Gini index was used to assess the inequality of payment distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After data collection, a descriptive analysis of payment data was conducted overall and by the demographic characteristics, including average and median monetary values per physician and the proportion of physicians receiving payments. Then, as previous studies repeatedly found, 16,[25][26][27] there was a significant difference in the payments between general physicians and leading physicians, namely, key opinion leaders, we performed the multivariable modified log-linked Poisson by the generalized estimating equations, as described in our previous study. 14 The Gini index was used to assess the inequality of payment distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After data collection, a descriptive analysis of payment data was conducted overall and by the demographic characteristics, including average and median monetary values per physician and the proportion of physicians receiving payments. Then, as previous studies repeatedly found, 16,25–27 there was a significant difference in the payments between general physicians and leading physicians, namely, key opinion leaders, we performed the multivariable modified log‐linked Poisson regression model for relative likelihood to receive personal payments by physician characteristics and the multivariable negative regression model for relative monetary values by physician characteristics. This study defined the leading PHOs as those who were professors at universities or university hospitals as of March 2022, positioned in the JSPHO board member in March 2022, and authors of clinical practice guidelines issued by the JSPHO between 2015 and 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At PHC level, there is often a lack of experience and expertise, gaps in knowledge, fear of hypoglycaemia, missing guidelines and even fear of prescribing insulin [35,36]. Additional challenges to insulin prescribing include the fact that some health professionals no longer know how to use human insulin as they have received their training in contexts where only analogue insulin is used [37] and the possible impact that the pharmaceutical industry might have on prescribing decisions of doctors [38,39].…”
Section: Human Insulin Analogue Insulinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Researchers in Australia have used the information about payments to doctors that is posted on the website of Medicines Australia (MA) to examine interactions between medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies. [4][5][6] However, payments to medical societies are not included in the reports from companies to MA and therefore sponsorship of these organisations has not been studied. This study investigates sponsorship of Australian and New Zealand societies by healthcare companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%