“…Clinical pharmacists filled in special data collection forms, recording patient demographics, medical and medications history, primary cancer, admission diagnosis, length of hospital stay, number and types of interventions during the study, the name of the medication associated with CPIs, the significance of the intervention and physicians’ acceptance of those interventions. The significance of the interventions was assessed on the Hatoum scale, 25,26 a scoring system used to evaluate the potential clinical significance of CPIs on a scale of 1, “adverse significance,” indicating that the recommendations were inappropriate and could lead to adverse outcomes; 2, “no significance,” indicating that the recommendation was informational; 3, “somewhat significant,” indicating that the benefit of the recommendation for the patient could be neutral; 4, “significant,” whereby the recommendation would bring care to a more appropriate level; 5, “very significant,” indicating avoidance of potential major organ dysfunction; and 6, “extremely significant,” indicating that the intervention avoided death.…”