2009
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmp033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical representatives do influence physician behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the retrospective, observational design of this natural experiment was a limitation and did not allow a clear causal relationship between the introduction of the NPI and changes in drug usage to be established. In particular, other factors such as views of other opinion leaders 11 and pharmaceutical representatives 12 which have been shown to have an impact on GP prescribing behaviour could not be measured. The influence of pharmaceutical representatives may have been a consideration, as newer antidepressants such as escitalopram and agomelatine would have been actively promoted during the period of this study and switching to these agents may have contributed to a change in dosulepin usage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the retrospective, observational design of this natural experiment was a limitation and did not allow a clear causal relationship between the introduction of the NPI and changes in drug usage to be established. In particular, other factors such as views of other opinion leaders 11 and pharmaceutical representatives 12 which have been shown to have an impact on GP prescribing behaviour could not be measured. The influence of pharmaceutical representatives may have been a consideration, as newer antidepressants such as escitalopram and agomelatine would have been actively promoted during the period of this study and switching to these agents may have contributed to a change in dosulepin usage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the increasing pressure placed on contemporary prescribers to make evidence-based management decisions, there appears to be a move away from traditional 'promotional personal engagement' activities and a favouring of 'non-personal engagement' and 'non-promotional personal engagement' activities. Indeed, in extreme cases, this evolution has become manifest in some centres banning calls from pharmaceutical sales representatives altogether, in favour of more scientific and less promotional engagement activities [8][9][10]. 'Non-personal engagement' activities are external information sources or activities existing outside the direct control of the company, but which may act as triggers of prescribing habit modifications (see Table 1).…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, healthcare professionals (HCP) do not have sufficient time to see pharmaceutical sales reps, but when they do see them, they expect more educational information from representatives than ever before. Pressured, pharmaceutical companies search for new approaches to introducing their products [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Traditional (Face-to-face) Visitsmentioning
confidence: 99%