2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical uptake kinetics in rainbow trout: In situ bioaccumulation in an effluent-dominated river influenced by snowmelt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in 96-h laboratory experiments with the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), Saari et al (2020) identified BCFs from 2 to 16.7 L/kg when water pH (8.1-8.4) was similar to the pH of the present study (8-8.4). More recently, Sims et al (2020) performed caged studies with rainbow trout in an effluent-dominated river, observed rapid uptake of diltiazem resulting in steady-state conditions within 24 to 72 h, and reported BCF values ranging from 10.1 to 72.6 L/kg. During the two 7-d in situ experiments, trout body burdens were directly influenced by surface water concentrations of diltiazem, which led the authors to conclude that waterborne exposure governs uptake (Sims et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in 96-h laboratory experiments with the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), Saari et al (2020) identified BCFs from 2 to 16.7 L/kg when water pH (8.1-8.4) was similar to the pH of the present study (8-8.4). More recently, Sims et al (2020) performed caged studies with rainbow trout in an effluent-dominated river, observed rapid uptake of diltiazem resulting in steady-state conditions within 24 to 72 h, and reported BCF values ranging from 10.1 to 72.6 L/kg. During the two 7-d in situ experiments, trout body burdens were directly influenced by surface water concentrations of diltiazem, which led the authors to conclude that waterborne exposure governs uptake (Sims et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Sims et al (2020) performed caged studies with rainbow trout in an effluent-dominated river, observed rapid uptake of diltiazem resulting in steady-state conditions within 24 to 72 h, and reported BCF values ranging from 10.1 to 72.6 L/kg. During the two 7-d in situ experiments, trout body burdens were directly influenced by surface water concentrations of diltiazem, which led the authors to conclude that waterborne exposure governs uptake (Sims et al 2020). In the present study, we observed similar BCF values, ranging from 7 to 35 L/kg (Table 1), for rainbow trout following exposure to diltiazem for 24 h. Such observations are also generally consistent with previous diltiazem studies using rainbow trout, though work by Steinbach et al (2016) provided BCFs for specific tissues instead of the body burden measurements provided in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After filtration, samples were fortified with 50 µl of a 2,000 µg L –1 deuterated internal standard solution. Water samples were then extracted following previously reported methods (Bean et al, 2018; Du et al, 2014; Haddad et al, 2018; Sims et al, 2020) using either strong cation‐exchange cartridges (Strata‐SCX, 500 mg; Phenomenex) for the sertraline treatment or Oasis HLB cartridges (6 ml/200 mg; Waters) for the acetaminophen treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrumental analysis, including limits of detection for target compounds, have been previously published (Bean et al, 2018; Burket et al, 2019; Haddad et al, 2018; Sims et al, 2020). Briefly, samples were analyzed via isotope‐dilution LC–MS/MS on an Agilent system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si bien la absorción de compuestos ionizables, como los fármacos humanos, en los peces es rápida, alcanzando condiciones de estado estable en unos pocos días, hay un interrogante en relación al comportamiento de estas sustancias en condiciones de campo (Sims et al, 2020). Es por ello que diversos autores han utilizado los ensayos in-situ de exposición, para evaluar el impacto toxicológico en peces, producido por los efluentes de aguas residuales (Muir et al, 2017;Pérez et al, 2018;Simmons et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified