2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01266-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceuticals in groundwaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
150
0
11

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 740 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
150
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that the recoveries for sulfapyridine and sulfamethazine in all the samples were rather satisfactory and in the range of 85-102%, but the recoveries of sulfathiazole and sulfadiazine were relatively lower in all samples, and the spiked recoveries for sulfathiazole and sulfadiazine were in the range of 55-79% and 72-92%, respectively. Compared with the recov- eries of sulfonamides obtained in other studies, the extraction efficiency of MWCNTs adsorbent was superior to MCX adsorbents (mixed mode strong cation exchange resin) (recoveries of sulfadiazine and sulfathiazole were less than 50%) [48] or C 2 /EVN + adsorbents (recoveries of sulfadiazine and sulfathiazole were no more than 20%) [50,56]. Furthermore, with the exception of sulfathiazole, the recoveries of sulfonamides were comparable with those extracted by hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) copolymer wildly used adsorbent for antibiotics [51][52][53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Analytical Performance and Sample Analysesmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was shown that the recoveries for sulfapyridine and sulfamethazine in all the samples were rather satisfactory and in the range of 85-102%, but the recoveries of sulfathiazole and sulfadiazine were relatively lower in all samples, and the spiked recoveries for sulfathiazole and sulfadiazine were in the range of 55-79% and 72-92%, respectively. Compared with the recov- eries of sulfonamides obtained in other studies, the extraction efficiency of MWCNTs adsorbent was superior to MCX adsorbents (mixed mode strong cation exchange resin) (recoveries of sulfadiazine and sulfathiazole were less than 50%) [48] or C 2 /EVN + adsorbents (recoveries of sulfadiazine and sulfathiazole were no more than 20%) [50,56]. Furthermore, with the exception of sulfathiazole, the recoveries of sulfonamides were comparable with those extracted by hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) copolymer wildly used adsorbent for antibiotics [51][52][53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Analytical Performance and Sample Analysesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Compared with the recov- eries of sulfonamides obtained in other studies, the extraction efficiency of MWCNTs adsorbent was superior to MCX adsorbents (mixed mode strong cation exchange resin) (recoveries of sulfadiazine and sulfathiazole were less than 50%) [48] or C 2 /EVN + adsorbents (recoveries of sulfadiazine and sulfathiazole were no more than 20%) [50,56]. Furthermore, with the exception of sulfathiazole, the recoveries of sulfonamides were comparable with those extracted by hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) copolymer wildly used adsorbent for antibiotics [51][52][53][54][55][56]. As sulfamethazine was one of the most commonly used sulfonamides mainly for veterinary applications [51], it could be frequently detected in environmental aqueous samples.…”
Section: Analytical Performance and Sample Analysesmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Studies have found residues of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites, from ng L -1 to mg L -1 levels, in aquatic environments in countries including Germany, Brazil, Canada, Holland, UK, Italy, Sweden and the USA. [10][11][12][13] However, since these chemicals belong to an emerging class of pollutants, the literature is still sparse concerning their behavior and interactions in hydric systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Studies have found residues of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites, from ng L -1 to mg L -1 levels, in aquatic environments in countries including Germany, Brazil, Canada, Holland, UK, Italy, Sweden and the USA. [10][11][12][13] However, since these chemicals belong to an emerging class of pollutants, the literature is still sparse concerning their behavior and interactions in hydric systems.Aquatic humic substances (AHS), the most important class of complexation agents present in the natural environment, play an important role in the transport and behavior of ED. 14 Characterization of the interactions of ED with AHS, exploring the formation and stability of possible ED-AHS complexes, can therefore provide important information concerning the availability of ED to aquatic biota.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%