Pharmacist Prescribing Activities—an Electronic Survey on the Opinions of Australian Pharmacists

Abstract

Aim To identify Australian pharmacists' awareness of their international colleagues' prescribing practices and explore their views about the feasibility and utility of pharmacist prescribing privileges within the scope of their current practice. Method Members of the AusPharmList, Australian Association of Consultant Pharmacy and The Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia were invited by e‐mail to participate in a community pharmacist, consultant pharmacist or hospital pharmacist electronic survey. These surveys were designed to elicit views concerning: dependent and independent prescribing; resource availability to support pharmacist prescribing; ability to justify prescribing decisions; and limitations of pharmacist prescribing. Results Of the 268 surveys completed (response rate 6.4%), 45% of respondents were aware of their international colleagues' prescribing activities. 74% agreed that pharmacists should be granted dependent prescribing authority, while 52% agreed that pharmacists should be granted independent prescribing authority. The majority (88%) indicated they could identify their own limitations and 86% believed they could justify their prescribing decisions as dependent prescribers. 73% believed they would benefit from prescribing authority in their daily scope of practice. Conclusion In 2004, awareness of international developments in pharmacist prescribing was not extensive among the respondents. However, many identified areas where they would benefit from dependent prescribing activities in their daily scope of practice.

An evaluation of Australian pharmacist’s attitudes on expanding their prescribing role

“…The level of support for independent prescribing in this study was less than reported in a previous Australian study [16]. However, that study was limited by a low response rate (6.4%) and an under-representation of community pharmacists [16]. Although in this study both supplementary and independent prescribing were positive predictors of expanding pharmaceutical services through prescribing, pharmacists who were in favour of supplementary prescribing showed a stronger association towards this expansion.…”

“…The current strong support for the supplementary model might suggest this model should be initially introduced. The level of support for independent prescribing in this study was less than reported in a previous Australian study [16]. However, that study was limited by a low response rate (6.4%) and an under-representation of community pharmacists [16].…”

Collaborative Prescribing: Views of SHPA Pharmacist Members

“…The response rate of 40% of SHPA members provides a larger hospital pharmacy sample size than previous local surveys. 14,15 This study found that in their daily practice, hospital pharmacists observed and experienced system delays. There was strong support for collaborative prescribing to assist service delivery, such as discharge prescribing.…”

Using scenarios to test the appropriateness of pharmacist prescribing in asthma management

“…To date, much of the Australian research has focused on exploring the practice landscape to ascertain its readiness for pharmacist prescribing, including: exploring views of pharmacists19,20,21,22, general practitioners23, and clients15; identifying needs and preferences for training and skill development24; surveying pharmacists’ experiences of training opportunities25,26; and developing frameworks for the implementation of pharmacist prescribing 27…”